ID |
Date |
Author |
Group |
Subject |
53
|
17 Apr 2025, 01:39 |
Chan Kim | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
- 18.8 keV, 260 uJ pulse energy
Optical laser delivery
Achievements/Observations
- Experimental setup optimized, both instrumental side and PIXIE side
- X-ray beam focused to the PIXIE and transmission measurement was done with several different PIXIE operation conditions.
Issues
- No beam for ~4.5 hours due to ZZ.
- X-ray beam not found with IRDa InlineMic after focusing X-ray beam to IRDa sample plane.
- InlineMic Y motor is in error states. It has to be fixed during the day.
- upstream kapton window for the downstream vacuum pipe broken. The glue has become loose. No damage by X-ray was visible.
|
52
|
14 Apr 2025, 23:08 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery:
20 keV, 250-400 uJ, 250 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Lots of data collection
Issues:
No major issue today |
51
|
14 Apr 2025, 09:50 |
Jan Gruenert | XPD | Status | Beam Downtime
During last night, apparently the photon beam was down in all SASE beamlines during two longer periods:
- between 2:48am and 3h23am (35 min) on 14.4.2025
- between 5:09am and 6h59am (1 hour 50 min) on 14.4.2025
|
50
|
13 Apr 2025, 22:55 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | Staff: PV, TS, JK, FK, + users
X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 300-400 uJ, 250 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Lots of data collection
Issues:
No major issue today |
49
|
12 Apr 2025, 23:15 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 500 uJ, 246 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Lots of data collection
Issues:
Shimadzu camera for Schlieren imaging had issue with shutter, mechanically broken. |
48
|
11 Apr 2025, 23:14 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 400 uJ, 246 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Spatial and temporal alignment of optical laser setup
Data collection |
47
|
10 Apr 2025, 23:17 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 400 uJ, 128 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Rough timing alignment of optical laser setup
Took some initial data
Issues:
No major issue to report |
46
|
09 Apr 2025, 22:46 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 400 uJ, 128 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
20 keV beam to sample position and cameras
Rough alignment of optical setup
Issues:
Optical laser from light conversion had issue with shutter control |
45
|
09 Apr 2025, 10:22 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | SA3 status | SASE3 Apple-X undulator cell 26 issue - SOLVED
During the night, an issue appeared with the SASE3 undulator cell 26 (2nd last Apple-X undulator).
This cell could not be operated and was in status open.
BKR therefore couldn't tune for linear vertical polarization as required by the SASE3 users at SXP.
A ZZ access was discussed and prepared with the experts from the undulator group.
However, they now found a way to repair the issue from remote without access (info from Mikhail Yakopov / undulator group at 10h20).
The issue is solved.
PRC will contact PES spectrometer experts at XPD to tune polarization monitoring with BKR. |
44
|
09 Apr 2025, 09:41 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | Issue | SASE1 XTD2 attenuator arm issue
On monday 7.4.2025, one of the SASE1 attenuator arms (SA1_XTD2_ATT/PNACT/A9) with a 2mm Silicon attenuator got stuck when inserted
EEE reports in the XO meeting today that DOC / EEE helped to unblock and remove it from the beam
(from the karabo-history, I assume this was on monday between 10h00 and 10h30).
This arm A9 is now blocked/disabled with the attenuator out of beam to prevent this to happen again until this issue is fixed.
To fix the issue for good and to re-enable operation of arm A9, an access to the tunnel XTD2 would be needed.
The group in charge of this beamline component is XRO. So far there is no access request.
CTRL (Wajid) reminds that also the karabo device needs to be blocked / unblocked.
This week, SPB/SFX receive SASE1 beam.
SPB/SFX (Chan Kim and Tomas Popelar) confirm that they can work this week without this attenuator arm,
in particular because they have their own attenuators and will not use the XTD2 attenuators.
Thus, for operations it seems that this access could wait at least until next week tuesday. |
43
|
07 Apr 2025, 15:35 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | Stability Issue | SASE1 pulse energy drops slowly three times
SASE1 XGM detects three times during the morning some slow drop in puls energies from the SASE1 undulator.
The machine cannot find any correlation with any electron diagnostics.
The XGM-measured beam position indicates no beam position drift (which could then by gradual clipping explain the loss in pulse energy). |
42
|
07 Apr 2025, 07:19 |
Harald Sinn | PRC | SA1 status | 7:15 SPB reports large background from non-lasing SASE3 bunches. BKR is informed.
7:50 BKR analysed situation. Everything concerning the orbits is OK, so the background is due to the standard spontaneous background (about < 1% level of FEL beam). With SASE3 running currently 255 lasing bunches and SASE1 single bunch the intensities will be on a similar level. Recommendation to SPB to close SRAs from 3 mm to maybe 1.5 mm to reduce background. |
41
|
06 Apr 2025, 06:33 |
Harald Sinn | PRC | SA2 status | 5:49 HED called and they have problems with the Laser Sync signal. A change of laser delay is not possibe. We supsect that it is similar to earlier this week at FXE, where a crash of a sync CPU caused a similar error. BRK is informed and tries to reach somebody from sync Group via email (at 6:35, no OCD phone number available) . If this does not work, we will work with the shifts starting at 7:00 on this (DOC and new BKR crew).
8:45 (see also DESY elog entries): After several attempts LBsync timing works, at least for now. One problem was that the crate was constantly rebooting by itself. Now it is stable, but error could happen again. In that case, BKR should activate expert via email.
Attachements: Location of LBsync server status in DOOCS and status of XFELcpuSYNCEXP1-3 for last light |
40
|
03 Apr 2025, 07:34 |
Harald Sinn | PRC | SA1 status | 7:20 FXE reports a problem with laser synchronisation (yellow warning light and could not change delay). BKR informs the DESY laser sync group.
7:51 DESY sync group reported that there was a CPU failing about 6 am this morning which led to the yellow warning light. However, synchronisation was very likely all the time ok withing 5-10fs. The CPU was now reset and everything should be wokring now. |
39
|
27 Mar 2025, 22:57 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift end | **X-ray delivery:**
* 16 keV, ~upto 1 mJ, 160 pulses
**Optical Laser:**
* None
**Achievements / Observations:**
* Alignement
* Recorded first explosions |
38
|
17 Mar 2025, 06:51 |
Romain Letrun | SPB | Issue | The status of the FXE shutter in the Public status display DOOCS panel is incorrect. Here appears as opened, when it is actually closed. |
37
|
15 Mar 2025, 19:49 |
Harald Sinn | PRC | Status | MID called and reported issue with Dachs terminals at the user labs (probably no power). TS was informed. Because the lab are currently accessible (doors are locked open), TS will take care about it on Monday. |
36
|
12 Mar 2025, 23:14 |
Raphael de Wijn | SPB | Shift summary |
SPB/SFX shift summary user experiment 6933 (setup day)
X-ray delivery
-9.6-9.72 keV with Hirex monitoring, 1.4-1.8 mJ/pulse, 352 pulses/train at 1.1 MHz pulse repetition rate, short pulses
Optical laser delivery
-ns laser for illumination
Achievements/Observations
- Beamline aligned
- Energy scan with Zn done and energy set around 9.72 keV (120 eV offset compared to the accelerator value)
- Aligned and could see scattering from silver cubes
|
35
|
04 Mar 2025, 07:05 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 188/352 pulses per train (~1 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5/1.1 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples |
34
|
03 Mar 2025, 07:05 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 188 pulses per train (~1 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples |
33
|
02 Mar 2025, 06:56 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 175 pulses per train (~1 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples
Issues
We could use 188 pulses, but last 13 pulses intensity was too weak, not used for measurement
|
32
|
01 Mar 2025, 11:53 |
Martin Dommach | PRC | Issue | Due to issues SCS has with pulses from SASE1 lasing in SASE3 and destroying, or at least modifying, their sample, it was decided to change the order in the RF configuration to have SASE3 pulses before SASE1. The change will be done at 12 pm, agreed with FXE.
The impact for SPB will be the loss a few pulses (5%), I contacted Richard to get confirmation that this is ok for SPB.
Best regards,
Martin (PRC week 9) |
31
|
01 Mar 2025, 06:56 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 202/352 pulses per train (~0.8 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5/1.1 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples
|
30
|
28 Feb 2025, 06:57 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 202/352 pulses per train (~0.8 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5/1.1 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples
Issues
No major issue today
|
29
|
27 Feb 2025, 07:02 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 202/352 pulses per train (~0.8 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5/1.1 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Fixed target measurement was finished |
28
|
25 Feb 2025, 02:41 |
Jayanath Koliyadu | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
-15 keV with Hirex monitoring, 0.5 mJ/pulse, 202 pulses/train at 0.56 MHz pulse repetition rate
Optical laser delivery
- 810 nm laser for illumination
-PP laser for excitation, 590 nm, 51 pulses, 141 kHz
Achievements/Observations
- Collected high resolution time resolved data
- Collected Tve_CPC500f and Tve_CPC1n data and completed Tve_CPC20p
|
27
|
21 Feb 2025, 23:21 |
Mohammad Vakili | SPB | Shift summary | SPB/SFX shift summary user experiment 8039
**X-ray delivery**
-15 keV with Hirex monitoring, 0.5 mJ/pulse, 202 pulses/train at 0.56 MHz pulse repetition rate
**Optical laser delivery**
-810 nm laser for illumination
**Achievements/Observations**
- Collected sample data for ca. 2h 15min using a DFFN
- XTD2 CRLs optimized and realigned
- Offset mirror M1/M2 optimized for 15 keV
- Repositioned the illumination fiber inside IRU chamber
- Germanium blades were installed for the IRU_Slit_4 (top and bottom)
**Issues**
- PP laser alignment could not be pursued as hexapod had to be repositioned first (interaction region was too close to exit cone)
|
26
|
20 Feb 2025, 23:29 |
Chan Kim | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
- 12.4 keV, 1.1mJ/pulse, 202 pulses/train at 0.56MHz
- Focused NKB beam was used
Optical laser delivery
- ns laser for jet visualization
Achievements/Observations
- Successfully finished all PCS beamtimes
- Stable jet with PEO sheath
Issues
- No beam in the morning
- Unstable jet with ethanol sheath
|
25
|
19 Feb 2025, 21:25 |
Chan Kim | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
-12.4 keV, 202 pulses, 0.5 MHz, 1mJ/pulse
Optical laser delivery
- ns laser (660 nm wavelength) for jet illumination
Achievements/Observations
- NKB focus optimized
- One PCS user program successfully finished
- Second PCS user program was just started
Issues
- Right before we could start with beam defocusing, the beam was gone around 8:45 pm. BKR called to let us know that there will be no beam today (cryo issues) |
24
|
17 Feb 2025, 06:57 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 202 pulses per train (~1.9 mJ pulse energy)@9.3 keV, 0.5 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned and timed
runs for -1 ps - 1.5 ps
Very stable jet
PAM was installed |
23
|
16 Feb 2025, 06:46 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 202 pulses per train (~1.9 mJ pulse energy)@9.3 keV, 0.5 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned and timed
runs for -1 ps - 1.5 ps
Very stable jet
Issues
No major issue
|
22
|
15 Feb 2025, 06:52 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 202 pulses per train (~1.9 mJ pulse energy)@9.3 keV, 0.5 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned and timed
runs for -1 ps - 1.5 ps
Very stable jet
Issues
No major issue |
21
|
13 Feb 2025, 07:24 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
up to 352 pulses per train (~1.9 mJ pulse energy)@9.3 keV, 0.5 MHz ans 1.1 MHz. Beamdown for 40 min.
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned and timed
1 hours data collection
Issues
AGIPD gain map was strange, some gain changes was observed without X-ray
Data was not migrated -> DRC was called and informed |
20
|
11 Feb 2025, 01:41 |
Tomas Popelar | SPB | Shift summary | SPB/SFX 7955 Day 4
X-ray delivery
Optical laser delivery
-
420nm used for sample excitation. timed to 1ps with water jet interaction
-
PAM set up for time points <1 ps
-
From 19:15 to 21:15 (100 uJ/cm2 data point) the feedback loops were off resulting in higher intensity fluctuations, resolved at 21:52
Achievements/Observations
-
x-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
-
PP laser aligned and timed
-
PAM calibrated and used with YAG sample surviving 13% transmission
-
power titration at 100ns and fluences 13 mJ/cm2, 25 mJ/cm2, 100 mJ/cm2 and 191 mJ/cm2
-
delays 100 fs and 500 fs
-
good peak distribution at 13% transmission (None / None / None / 3200 CVD)
-
hit rate around 6%
Issues
|
Draft
|
10 Feb 2025, 00:56 |
Raphael de Wijn | SPB | Shift summary | SPB/SFX 7955 Day 3
X-ray delivery
-
up to 202 pulses per train (~1.4 mJ pulse energy), 0.5 MHz.
-
One longer down toward the end of the shift
Optical laser delivery
- 420nm used for sample excitation. timed to 1ps with water jet interaction
Achievements/Observations
-
x-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
-
PP laser aligned and timed
-
runs for 1ps, 100ps and 100ns pumped data sets
-
hit rate much better (even > 10%) than previous day with small crystals
Issues
|
18
|
09 Feb 2025, 06:35 |
Peter Zalden | FXE | Shift summary | Preparation for user expt #7944
X-ray delivery
- Single pulses (10 Hz) at 9.3 keV, 2.3 mJ
- Again similar low pointing noise
Achievements/Observations
- Tested different substrates for deposition of ice
- Optimized ice deposition conditions
- Recorded example data to prepare analysis scripts
Handover
- Beam transport to SPB and 11 keV requested from BKR at 6:30h
|
17
|
08 Feb 2025, 23:44 |
Raphael de Wijn | SPB | Shift summary | SPB/SFX 7955 Day 2
**X-ray delivery**
* up to 202 pulses per train (~1.4 mJ pulse energy), 0.5 MHz.
* A few beam downs toward the end of the shift
**Optical laser delivery**
* 420nm used for sample excitation. timed to 1ps with water jet interaction
**Achievements/Observations**
* x-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
* PP laser aligned and timed
* runs for 1ps pumped data set
* good peak distribution at 11% transmission (100 CVD/ 200 CVD / None / 3200 CVD)
* hit rate better than previous day
**Issues**
* a lot of nozzle exchange
* sample most likely accumulating on the catcher entrance window
* DAMNIT issue with too many queued jobs, fixed by Oleksii (OCD)
**To do for next shift**
* finish power titration and continue with other time points |
16
|
08 Feb 2025, 06:25 |
Peter Zalden | FXE | Shift summary | Preparation for user expt #7944
X-ray delivery
- Since pulses (10 Hz) at 9.3 keV, 2.2 mJ
- Again similar low pointing noise
Achievements/Observations
- Confirmed amorphous ice deposition and -removal
- Optimized scattering geometry
- Calibrated detector position
Handover
- Beam transport to SPB and 11 keV recovered by BKR
|
15
|
08 Feb 2025, 00:00 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary | SPB/SFX 7955 Shift 1
**X-ray delivery**
* up to 202 pulses per train (~1.4 mJ pulse energy), 0.5 MHz.
**Optical laser delivery**
* 420nm used for sample excitation. timed to 1ps with water jet interaction
* difficult to find good filter combination for jet illumination laser and pump laser
**Achievements/Observations**
* 10.8 keV - 11.2 keV energy scan
* lysozyme geometry data set
* several runs for sample dark data set (potentially more needed)
* a few runs for 1ps pumped data set (definitely more needed)
**Issues**
* difficult end to shift (nozzle and illumination issues)
* hit rate rather low for timing program (leads to long processing times)
**To do for next shift**
* continue user data set including power titration
* start time delay sequence |
14
|
07 Feb 2025, 05:56 |
Peter Zalden | FXE | Shift summary | Preparation for user expt #7944
X-ray delivery
- since pulses (10 Hz) at 9.3 keV, 3 mJ
- Pointing stability 55 um RMS in the horizontal plane on FXE PI, which is lower as compared to earlier values
Achievements/Observations
- Aligned xrays into FXE vacuum/cryo setup
- Performed ice depositions in-situ and characterized by Xray
Handover
- Beam transport to SPB and 11 keV recovered
- We left Hirex inserted during FXE operation, but closed the GH2 shutter. It is still closed.
Issues
- XTD2 crl lens3x motor moving in wrong direction and already past all limits. Created ticket with EEE (no DOC available) #216784. Lens3x is not needed for the ongoing experiment, but the situation is potentially dangerous.
|
13
|
06 Feb 2025, 23:24 |
Raphael de Wijn | SPB | Issue | Damage on FEL imager was also seen by our morning shift around 7:50am. |
12
|
06 Feb 2025, 23:13 |
Raphael de Wijn | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
- up to 202 pulses per train (~1.4 mJ pulse energy), 0.5 MHz.
Optical laser delivery
- OPO issue in the late shift
- PP laser aligned and timed both at the interaction point and in PAM
Achievements/Observations
- gotthard II used and working
- PP laser aligned and timed
- PAM aligned and timed
Issues
- issue with the OPO when we wanted to collect data
To do for next shift
- collect lysozyme for geometry and start user program
|
11
|
06 Feb 2025, 23:02 |
Peter Zalden | FXE | Issue | We observed a damage spot on the SA1 FEL imager. It moves with the target holder, but not sure if its damage on the optical mirror or on the target itself.
This issue is not critical, but can become problematic in case one wants to determine beam size or state of optics (ATT or CRLs) upstream. |
10
|
05 Feb 2025, 23:42 |
Raphael de Wijn | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
- up to 202 pulses per train (~1 mJ pulse energy), 0.5 MHz.
Optical laser delivery
- PP laser aligned to the interaction point
Achievements/Observations
Preparation for user beamtime
- x-ray beam aligned and focused
- gotthard II ready
- PP laser aligned and ready
- ns laser aligned and ready
- inline mic aligned
|
9
|
01 Feb 2025, 15:40 |
Frederik Wolff-Fabris | PRC | Status | Saturday 01.Feb around 2AM machine went down due to problems with cold magnet at A20:
https://ttfinfo.desy.de/elog/XMLlist?file=/XFELelog/data/2025/05/31.01_n/2025-02-01T07:06:16-04.xml&xsl=/elogbook/xsl/elog.xsl&picture=true
During the early morning BKR used a diffrent trajectory at LINAC to continue lasing, altough with poor performance.
A Desy expert was found (voluntary basis) to made a second ZZ in the morning between 10:30 and 12:30 which fixed the faulty relay for the quadrupole/cold magnet quench system.
Beam was restored to FXE, HED and SQS instruments at ~14:00, including the change of photon energies in SA1 and SA2 as well as pointing corrections and necessary fine tuning. |
8
|
31 Jan 2025, 21:24 |
Chan Kim | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
- 11.0 keV, up to 352 pulses at 1.1 MHz, 900 uJ.
Optical laser delivery
- ns illumination and pp lasers
Achievements/Observations
- Finished with Ice detection program
- Optimized the beamline alignment for the next experiment
- Checked the NKB focusing with CRL collimation: The collimated scheme resulted in smaller focus size and significantly higher intensity at focus
Issues
- PAM mirror mount is not reacheable with the SmarAct motor
|
7
|
31 Jan 2025, 12:43 |
Frederik Wolff-Fabris | PRC | SA3 status | A ZZ is organized to happen now, 31.01 at ~12:40, in order to reset a cabinet belonging to one of the Apple-X undulators.
This is agreed with North Branch instruments and RC/BKR.
**Update 13:25: ZZ was successful; SA1 and SA3 beams restored at 13:25 |
6
|
31 Jan 2025, 06:28 |
Jörg Hallmann | MID | Shift summary |
- Alignment of KB mirrors: focused beam H150-200nm x V300-350nm. Characterization of focused beam with wire scan.
- Installed ePIX table and ePIX. Thorlabs server is not running, needs to be fixed by controls during the morning shift
- Aligned rotation center of SSRY and put the beam into it. Moved alignment pin down by 10mm and put protecting cover on it.
- Aligned DES spectrometer crystal (using YAG) to 9keV.
- Checked CRL2 focusing with 9keV. Smallest is 9um (with bender adjust).
- Alexey played with Mono further, second reflection not found. Problem found with actuator.
- Tested FF data. Seems to be good.
-
|
5
|
30 Jan 2025, 23:08 |
Chan Kim | SPB | Shift summary | X-ray delivery
- 11.0 keV, up to 178 pulses at 564 kHz, 650 uJ.
Optical laser delivery
- illumination and pp lasers
Achievements/Observations
- Performed detector and ice detection program.
Issues
- Run Controller was crashing several times during the day. DOC was notified. They discovered that the run controller server was down and fixed the problem by restarting it.
- PP laser was not available during the day until ~ 18:30
- Some troubles with and homing of SmarAct stages after update from to the current control version. DOC was requested to roll back to the latest stable release.
|
4
|
30 Jan 2025, 13:59 |
Frederik Wolff-Fabris | PRC | SA3 status | On 29.01 evening the SA3 pre-absorber was interlocked due to M5 mirror.
With the help of Maurizio V., it was found the M5 RY motor has to be driven to 400um position to release the interlock condition and permit beam to SXP and SQS. This relates to a limit switch which was in a undesired location and about 1mm out of position. |
3
|
29 Jan 2025, 09:08 |
Andreas Koch | XPD | SA3 status | The SA3 FEL imager is now protected via the Big Brother server, which creates a beam limit on the bunch pattern server if necessary.
contact Andreas Koch, Lars Fröhlich for more details or consult the imager manual, section 2.9:
https://docs.xfel.eu/share/page/site/xfelwp74/document-details?nodeRef=workspace://SpacesStore/1766b430-7c48-4c46-bb2d-1774d69e1246
demonstration 27.1.2025 to Jan Grünert, Harald Sinn, Andreas Galler.
Function: The Big Brother limits the number of pulses in SA3 via a beam limit in case of danger, individually for each screen of the FEL imager, AND only if an imager screen is inserted. The EPS is valid as before.
This means that if the EPS interlock for the FEL imager is enabled (default setting, 2 pulses maximum), the intervention by the Big Brother could reduce pulses to 1 or 0.
The potential limit of the number of pulses for each screen is shown in the FEL imager scene, as before.
Best practice: Use the GATT to limit the pulse energy. Avoid to operate with a strongly saturated image. Use low absorbing ND filters.
eLogs posts to: eLog Operation-2025, Zulip SASE3_INSTRUMENT_COMMISSIONING, ttfinfo |
2
|
19 Jan 2025, 11:46 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | Issue | 1) BKR calls SUN11h20 and informs about issues with the SA1 SRA. Motors in ERROR.
2) Additionally, there was this morning a fire alarm, where in one rack (SASE1 rack 1.1 in XTD2) the gas extinguishing system was triggered, see also https://ttfinfo.desy.de/XFELelog/show.jsp?dir=/2025/03/19.01_M&pos=2025-01-19T10:22:14
PRC investigating.
BEAM STATUS: SA1 is still lasing at 1100 uJ at 9 keV, IMGFEL is inserted and beam visible. XGM and imagers operational.
- All SA1-SRA MOTORS (SA1_XTD2_PSLIT/MOTOR/) in sa1_beckhoff_mov are in ERROR and cannot be reset.
- Same for SA1_XTD2_FLT/MOTOR/TARGET (in ERROR and cannot be reset)
- SA1_XTD2_SRA_SLIT/MDL/MAIN in ERROR
- Same for SA1_XTD9_IMGPII45/MOTOR/NAVITAR_FOCUS and _ZOOM, but these karabo devices can be RESET, however Hardware State remains ERROR. Hardware interlocked.
- Same for SA1_XTD2_PES/SWITCH/G1_OK and G2_OK, but these karabo devices can be RESET, and the Hardware State here is then OFF. Hardware REGION is normal.
- SA1_XTD2_PES/SERIAL/V101256D and SA1_XTD2_PES/VALVE/V101256D in ERROR, can be reset. the STATE = NORMAL.
- Also found in ERROR: SA1_XTD2_WATCHDOG/MDL/STOP2_BKG_IMGFEL (but can be reset, is stopped).
- BeckhoffPlcMonitor SA1_BR_SYS/PLC/MOV_PLCMON in ERROR, can be reset, Hardware state NORMAL.
- SA1_XTD9_MIRR/ACTRL/RZ in ERROR (not the other related motors)
- SA1_XTD2_PSLIT/LVDT/BLADE... all in ERROR, can be reset, then hardware state ON. Hardware error description: "PLC Error: Terminal is not operational"
- SA1_XTD9_MIRR/ASESN/RY and RZ in ERROR, can be reset, then hardware state ON. Hardware error description: "0xc009"
- SA1_BR_SYS/PLC/XFELO_PLCMON in ERROR, can be reset, Hardware state NORMAL.
- SA1_XTD2_DOOCS/CAM/OTRC_2615_T9 (DOOCS-to-karabo bridge for transmissive imager) not instantiated. I instantiate it, there are no issues, works fine.
- Everything OK with SA1 vacuum devices.
Actions for BKR to continue SASE tuning:
- The IMGFEL image is oversaturated. Changing to BN. The beam is at (13.5mm / 4mm), while the handover cross is at (12.75, 5.22mm). Beam is clipping at the top SRA blade.
- inserting transmissive imager (YAG). Beam is fully visible and centered at X=1045,Y=1140. Instruction to BKR to use this imager to shift the beam center, and then continue on IMGFEL.
Further actions:
- Information to DRC (Bruno)
- He will inform EEE-OCD to look into the issue and see what they might be able to fix without an access.
- If they find out an access is required to fix hardware in XTD2, we will request an access (probably not today but MON or TUE).
- A redmine ticket of DOC will collect the infos from DRC and EEE-OCD.
A similar issue at SA1 XTD2 rack 1.1 had occurred in November 2024, see https://in.xfel.eu/elog/OPERATION-2024/205
Updates MON morning:
- EEE made the access request and it was scheduled for MON 10am: #215916 - Suspected blown fuse replacement in Rack 1.1
|
1
|
14 Jan 2025, 07:38 |
Andreas Koch | XPD | SA3 status | The image intensifier in the SQS Exit Slit imager had been exchanged on request of SQS, Thomas Baumann.
Model: Hamamatsu MCP C9546-03-Y001 against C9546-01.
The position of the YAG screen on the camera is slightly shifted which may slightly affect the spectral axis, a few pixels vertically, and approximately 15 pixels horizontally.
The image scale by zoom had not been changed, as before 13 µm/pixel. |
|