Group Selection Page HELP Controls Group ITDM Vacuum WP78 SPB SQS XO ToBeMigrated2XWiki ToBeMigrated2GitlabPages ToBeMigratedByGroup Migrated2Zulip Archived2PDF not2MigrateOrArchive
SCS SXP Migrated2Zulip Photon Commissioning Team XRO DOC HED Migrated2Zulip WP74 MID PSPO_XO XO_Operation SQS Migrated2Zulip FXE Migrated2Zulip DET Sample Environment SPB Migrated2Zulip
OPERATION-2025 OPERATION-2024 OPERATION-2023 OPERATION-2022 OPERATION-2021 OPERATION-2020 OPERATION-2019 SASE1-2018 SASE1-2017 Experiment data
  OPERATION-2025 logbook, Contact: F.Wolff-Fabris, A.Galler, H.Sinn  Not logged in ELOG logo
Message ID: 71     Entry time: 22 May 2025, 23:29
Author: Raphael de Wijn 
Group: SPB 
Subject: Shift summary 

Staff: @**Katerina Doerner**  @**Elizabeth Galtry** @**Raphael de Wijn** @**Mohammad Vakili** @**Chan Kim** @**Diogo Melo** 

**X-ray delivery**
- 9.34 keV, 1400-1600 uJ pulse energy

**Optical laser delivery**
- illumination laser

**Achievements/Observations**
-  Collected some NQO1 data
- Had some hours to play around with HV with the old device. We observed a few things:
     - Without HV we could get close to 10 hz, but with jitter of +/-3hz
     - With HV at 1.2V, we clearly saw a strong effect on the droplet hz, could go from 10 Hz to 20 Hz, but the problem of the jitter remains, this looks like the main issue have the droplets frequency under control
     - We observed that with water the diode signal was one single peak, whereas with sample there were a few peaks for the whole droplet width, we tested and it indeed seems that the crystals in the droplets either refracted away or absorbed a portion of the beam to yield that diode laser peak profile...

ELOG V3.1.4-7c3fd00