Group Selection Page HELP DOC Controls Group Data Analysis Group ITDM WP76 DET Vacuum XRO EEE WP78 WP74 FXE SCS SPB MID HED SQS SXP Sample Environment Photon Commissioning Team Operation PSPO XO TS
OPERATION-2024 OPERATION-2023 OPERATION-2022 OPERATION-2021 OPERATION-2020 OPERATION-2019 SASE1-2018 SASE1-2017 Experiment data
  OPERATION-2024 logbook, Contact: F.Wolff-Fabris, A.Galler, H.Sinn, Page 5 of 11  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Datedown Author Group Subject
  128   22 Jul 2024, 15:27 Antje TrappXROSASE3 end of shift summary

this morning, ZZ was done together with Sylvia Huynh (EEE) to solve softmono pre-mirror motor issue https://redmine.xfel.eu/issues/177392

The issue was solved and also mechanical functionality of the stage was checked.

After ZZ, the beamline remained interlocked. Hutches will be searched and closed tonight to allow final checks on Tuesday

  129   22 Jul 2024, 15:20 Antje TrappXROSASE2 end of shift summary

Beam is now aligned back to HED for hand-over to Naresh (see picture)

points achieved:

-vibometer measurements on M2 at high energy, 2,1 and 3 mrad setting

-tried again to find beam through pblm grating, but no success

Attachment 1: HED_beam__2024-07-22_15-19-15.png
HED_beam__2024-07-22_15-19-15.png
  127   18 Jun 2024, 13:03 Kelin TascaXROCompensation of M2 RY motor for the case of Piezo off

We plan to put the piezos of M2 off, in the (unprobable) case that this is the reason of the "jumps" in SASE3 trajectory.

Therefore, I measured the change on RY and RZ motors, to correct all the positions

Fig 1: initial position, Motors Ry=10.5425 and RZ=-14.7200  Piezo Ry =5 and Rz=5

Fig 2: Ry is compensated, Motors Ry=10.4990 and RZ=-14.72  Piezo Ry =0 and Rz=5

Fig 3: Rz is compensated, Motors Ry=10.4990 and RZ=-14.7574  Piezo Ry =0 and Rz=0

 

Differential values: RY needs to be adjusted by -0.0435 and Rz by -0.0374

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-06-18_13-16-14.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-18_13-16-14.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-06-18_13-18-15.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-18_13-18-15.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-06-18_13-20-06.png
Screenshot_from_2024-06-18_13-20-06.png
  126   14 Jun 2024, 01:53 Jörg HallmannMIDShift summary

continue with Tempus tests
continue with PAM commissioning (first results of the working device at MID)

comments:
changed to 10 keV in order to use only one focussing lens in CRL2 and generating a smaller focus

issues:
vacuum issues in the MPC (reason: open roughing valve)
FSSS (hall sensor broken - exchange of the entire device planned for tomorrow)

  125   13 Jun 2024, 01:46 Jörg HallmannMIDShift summary

alignment of the instrument including collimation and beam shaping
test of the tempus detector using standard samples with different rep rates, intensities & # of pulses
start commissioning of the PhotonArrivalMonitor (temporal & spatial overlap, white light spectrum)

  124   11 Jun 2024, 00:43 Abhisakh SarmaSPBShift summary

**X-ray delivery**

  • 7.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz, 1.0 mJ.

**Optical laser delivery**

  • ns laser for jet illumination

**Achievements/Observations**

  • Data collection completed for all the requested samples from user.


**Issues**

  • Run repeater behave once abnormally.  Run repeater started with 30 minutes duration, but the first run (run #238) stopped after 40 seconds and next run (run #239) started.

 

  123   09 Jun 2024, 22:45 Chan KimSPBShift summary

X-ray delivery

  • 7.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz, 1.0 mJ.

Optical laser delivery

  • ns laser for jet illumination

Achievements/Observations

  • Data collection for user sample through column

Issues

  • Pressure spike while rotating nozzle tripped AGIPD
  • Temperature of ASICs of Q2M1 module too low and not easy to turn it on (issue solved after changing the bath temperature to -27 degreeC)
  • Julabo chiller issue again (In the end, set temperature changed to -29.5 degreeC and continued the experiment)
  • Another 2 ASICs in Q2M2 and Q2M3 seem unhappy
  122   09 Jun 2024, 22:21 Giuseppe MercurioSCSShift summary

Late Shift summary

Achievements:
- recovered the beam overlap
- changed lens position to have larger OL beam
- spatial overlap on YAG
- measured RIXS data delay scan at fixed photon energy

Problems:
- none

  121   08 Jun 2024, 23:20 Abhisakh SarmaSPBShift summary

X-ray delivery
- 7.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz, 1.0 mJ.
- X-ray beam pointing changed at around 18:12 and it affects nano KB focus (from ~200nm to ~1um).


Optical laser delivery
- ns laser for jet illumination


Achievements/Observations
- Detector moved the most upstream position (~1.5 m sample to detector distance)
- BG measurement with water, buffer low salt
- Silver Behenate measurement for geometry file (mostly for detector distance)
- Data collection for different sample (pure) concentrations

  120   08 Jun 2024, 15:21 Natalia GerasimovaSCSShift summary

Morning shift on 08.06.2024 (Natalia, Teguh, Yi Ping)

Achievements:

  • Focus the KB to ca. 40 um
  • Found time zero using delay scan of the RIXS PFY
  • Found strong pump probe effect on the Fe reference sample

Problems:

  • We lost pump probe signal during time zero scan
  • The static RIXS count is halved
  119   07 Jun 2024, 23:12 Chan KimSPBShift summary

X-ray delivery
- 7.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz, 1.0 mJ.
- Average pulse energy was about 1.9 mJ on Tuesday and Wednesday. It has to be discussed with BKR tomorrow morning.

Optical laser delivery
- ns laser for jet illumination

Achievements/Observations
- BG measurement with water, buffer low salt
- Lysozyme measurement for geometry file
- Data collection for six different sample concentrations [2 x 15 minutes runs]

Issues
- Pulse energy is very low as compared with Tuesday and Wednesday in this week.
- Damage found on IRU_SLIT4 Top and Bottom blades.
- NKB focus moved by ~20um at around 15:00 (during the handover period). SideMic X moved +20um to compensate it.

  118   07 Jun 2024, 15:19 Giuseppe MercurioSCSShift summary

Morning Shift Summary for 07.06.2024 (Teguh, Natalia)

Achievements:

  • Aligned the beamline to deliver the FEL beam into the hutch
  • Check the FEL beam size using knife-edge scans
  • Requested BKR to re-tune the FEL to achieve higher pulse energy. They are still tuning, but we aim to reach 3 mJ per pulse

Problems:

  • The filter between CHEM and hRIXS broke, so we had to replace it twice as it kept being broken whenever we close the filter. We fixed it by exchanging the O-ring and tightening the filter more when mounting it.
  • In the morning BKR did not tune the FEL properly, so the pointing was wrong and it took them 1 hour to fix it.
  117   05 Jun 2024, 23:22 Romain LetrunSPBShift summary

X-ray delivery

  • 7.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz, 1.6-1.9 mJ.
  • Average pulse energy tuned up to 1.9 mJ at 14:45, but slow continuous decay after that down to 1.7 mJ at the end of the shift.
  • 45 minutes downtime in the morning and another 15 minutes to reset the IBFB later on, as coordinated by the PRC.

Optical laser delivery

  • 800 nm, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz.
  • Large intensirty gradient through the burst compared to previous days. Recovered after moving the RF phase shifter. LAS informed.

Achievements/Observations

  • Collected calibration and background data for upcoming user experiment.
  116   04 Jun 2024, 23:38 Romain LetrunSPBShift summary

X-ray delivery

  • 7.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz, ~1.7 mJ.
  • Number of pulses initially limited to 178. Promptly addressed by BKR.

Optical laser delivery

  • 800 nm, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz.
  • Oscillating wavelength due to known faulty DMBCC stage, but otherwise stable delivery.

Achievements/Observations

  • Aligned instrument and collected data with test samples as well as various background signals in preparation for next suer experiment.

Issues

  • Changing the ROI of a Zyla appears to affect its timing.
  115   27 May 2024, 23:33 Romain LetrunSPBShift summary

X-ray delivery

  • 6.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz 1.3-1.8 mJ.
  • Decaying intensity through the day. Recovered once at 15:15 and slowly decaying again after that.

Optical laser delivery

  • 770 nm, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz and 101 at 282 kHz.
  • Wavelength drift due to problem with BCC piezo stage. Mitigated by LAS.

Achievements/Observations

  • Collected time-resolved diffraction from gold and gold-platinum nanorods/spheres at multiple laser fluences.

Issues

  • Problem with the four ASICs in module Q2M1 of AGIPD could not be solved. Operated without those for today. Will be further investigated later on.
  114   27 May 2024, 06:41 Konopkova ZuzanaHEDShift summary

beam parameters: 2 colors at around 6.5 keV, 1 pulse

achievements:

user program continues with data acquisition at slightly varying photon energies (tens of eV both colors simultaneously) and at different delays between the colors

Issues:

  • users have scheduled datasets to be measured overnight with larger delays up to 350 fs, however, the BKR was able to go only up to 100 fs delay despite having larger delays earlier in the experiment (even during nights)
  113   26 May 2024, 23:23 Romain LetrunSPBShift summary

X-ray delivery

  • 6.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz, 1.8-1.9 mJ.
  • Stable delivery except for downtime at start of shift (until 7:15) and two more hours in the morning.

Optical laser delivery

  • 770 nm, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz.
  • Stable delivery.

Achievements/Observations

  • Collected time-resolved diffraction from gold and gold-platinum nanorods at multiple laser fluences.

Issues

  • Vacuum spike in EHU_PSLIT section.
  • DAMNIT backend process stuck. A couple of Maxwell nodes were unaccessible. Solved by DOC and DA OCD.
  • Issue with two AGIPD modules noticed around 21:20. Could not be recovered before end of the shift. To be further investigated tomorrow morning.
  112   26 May 2024, 21:56 Thomas BaumannSQSStability Issue

We asked the machine for two color mode in the morning. Tuning gave good results at first (1.6mJ second color, 100uJ first color), but as soon as any of the colors was switched off and on again the pulse energy dropped (~600uJ) and BKR had to retune to even get a fraction of the pulse energy back back. The same happened when changing the delay

 

  111   26 May 2024, 00:23 Romain LetrunSPBShift summary

X-ray delivery

  • 6.0 keV, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz and 101 at 282 kHz, 0.8-1.6 mJ
  • Low pulse energy after beam handover. Improved around 10:00.
  • ~1.5 hour downtime due to issue with A5.
  • Several timing jumps of up to 1.5 ps visible on BAM and confirmed by X-ray/optical laser timing measurement at the instrument.

Optical laser delivery

  • 770 nm, up to 202 pulses at 564 kHz and 101 at 282 kHz.
  • Stable delivery.

Achievements/Observations.

  • Collected time-resolved diffraction from gold and gold-platinum nanorods at multiple laser fluences and over long and short delay scans.

Issues

  • AGIPD interlocked overnight and again during the morning due to temperature.
  • Had to perform timing measurement and correction multiple times throughout the day due to timing jumps.
  110   25 May 2024, 02:38 Rebecca BollSQSIssue

Today in the afternoon, SASE1 was tuned (a description of the activities in att 4). We now realize that this has in some form changed the SQS pulse parameters.

att 1 shows ion spectra recorded under nominally the same photon parameters before (run 177) and after (run 247)

it's also visible in the history of the SASE viewer that the behavior of the SASE3 pulse energy is different before and after 15:45, which is right when SASE1 was tuned. it clearly started fluctuating more. however, we don't think that the pulse energy fluctuations themselves are the reason for the large change in our data, we rather suspect a change in the pulse duration and/or the source point to cause this. however, we have no means to characterize this now after the fact.

it is particularly unfortunate that the tuning happened exactly BEFORE we started recording a set of reference spectra on the SASE3 spectrometer, which were supposed to serve as a calibration for the spectral corelation analysis to determine the group duration, as well as for a training data set to use the PES with machine learning as a virtual spectrometer for the large data set taken in the shifts before.

Attachment 1: Run_177_vs_247.png
Run_177_vs_247.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-05-25_00-44-46.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-25_00-44-46.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_from_2024-05-25_01-03-29.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-25_01-03-29.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_from_2024-05-25_01-36-54.png
Screenshot_from_2024-05-25_01-36-54.png
ELOG V3.1.4-7c3fd00