ID |
Date |
Author |
Group |
Subject |
9
|
25 Jan 2023, 08:44 |
Raśl Villanueva-Guerrero | PRC | ZZ Access on 24th January (19:30h) - Replacement of Motor on SASE2 Undulator - Cell 17 Phase Shifter |
Dear all,
last evening Suren Karabekyan and myself did a short notice ZZ access to XTD1. The reason is that machine operators detected the lack of response on the Cell 17 Phase Shifter. The intervention was successful and around 20:30 we left the tunnel.
Regards,
R. |
8
|
25 Jan 2023, 08:40 |
Raśl Villanueva-Guerrero | PRC | All SASE's - SEPS Interlock Test - Results, Status & Upcoming Schedule |
Dear all,
please find here a summary of the status on this critical topic provided yesterday evening (around 19:15) by Zunaira Ansari (extract from her e-mail).
"Dear colleagues,
Thank you very much for your cooperation. SEPS interlock tests are completed in all SASEs except SASE3. AIBS interlock tests are complete in all hutches.
SASE3 SEPS interlock will be tested on Monday the 30th of January strating from 9a.m.
I kindly request the use of the SQS control hutch for the testing.
All SASE3 hutches will be interlocked on Monday morning.
@Maurizio and Bernard/ Nerea: Could you please be present during the testing? IIt will be much appreciated.
I would very much like to thank Eric, Nerea and especially Bernard for helping with the interlock tests today.
Best regards,
Zunaira
|
7
|
23 Jan 2023, 10:43 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | Status |
Status of machine SASE tuning (just before switching off for monday maintenance):
11.5 GeV operation |
SASE1 |
SASE2 |
SASE3 |
Photon energy |
7 keV |
7 keV |
700 eV |
Max. obtained average pulse energy |
3.25 mJ |
1.35 mJ |
5.8 mJ |
FEL pointing confirmed on IMGFEL handover cross ? |
|
YES |
|
|
Attachment 1: JG_2023-01-23_um_10.04.56.png
|
|
6
|
22 Jan 2023, 18:40 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | Issue |
SASE1 blocked to 1 bunch/train by EPS interlock (sic, not 2 but 1) --- PARTIALLY RESOLVED
Several issues:
1) MODEM device is broken, in state UNKNOWN, see ATT#1 and ATT#2. Fixed with deinstatiating and then using BECKHOFF_ASSISTANT to re-instantiate. --> ATT#3
2) Several devices in XTD9 are causing that MODES is interlocked: I restart broken devices of the FXE-PBLM and SPB-PBLM.
Then there is a broken MDL of SPB_XTD9_SCR called SPB_XTD9_SCR/MDL/BIU. This MDL is not in the SA1-topic system topology but shown with (X) on the SA1_MAIN scene, and this screen is blocking the interlock (see ATT#4)
SPB_XTD9_SCR/VSWITCH/HOLSTER_X_LIMITL is triggering the interlock SA1_SYS_EPS2MPS/DCTRL/MODES and causing that the machine cannot go to more than 2 bunches per train.
Even when going to SPB-topic this issue cannot be solved - all devices in SPB-topic related to this SCR seem fine.
3) To allow SASE1 tuning by the machine, BKR is closing shutter XS3. This avoids any beam into XTD9, resolved the interlock problem and allows the machine to continue SASE tuning.
4) We don't know what had blocked the beam not only to 2 but actually to 1 bunch / train (no traces of problems in Big Brother).
|
Attachment 1: JG_2023-01-22_um_17.43.36.png
|
|
Attachment 2: JG_2023-01-22_um_18.17.31.png
|
|
Attachment 3: JG_2023-01-22_um_18.23.20.png
|
|
Attachment 4: JG_2023-01-22_um_18_1.37.21.png
|
|
5
|
21 Jan 2023, 16:38 |
Jan Gruenert | XPD | Analyze and quantify the mispositioning of the new 4mm-aperture behind the undulator |
Goal: Analyze and quantify the mispositioning of the new 4mm-aperture behind the undulator
Positions in tunnel:
- ABSP4.2422.SA2 = ABSP4.CELL37.SA2 L_z position 2422.558m
- Last closed undulator for this test is cell16 at 2294m (at end of segment) = SR radiation source point
- IMGTR = 2576m (BT=181.1m, PD=582.0m).
- IMGSR = 2586m (BT=191.6m, PD=591.5m).
- IMGFEL = 2637m (BT=242.0m, PD=642,8m).
- Sequence: end-of-cell16 -- ABSP4 -
Measurements:
- IMGTR : dX=15.15-8.25=6.9mm. dY=17-9.8=7.2mm. Aperture shadow mean diameter = 7.1mm
- IMGSR : Aperture shadow mean diameter = ca. 8.5 mm
- IMGFEL : Aperture shadow mean diameter = 9.0 mm.
The handover cross is at dy = +1.0mm (up) and dx = -2.6mm (left) relative to the apparent center of the aperture shadow.
Comments to the screenshots:
- The handover cross on the IMGFEL cannot be seen simultaneously with the weak SR background because it has the color scaled to high intensity beam.
- The FEL beam spot is almost perfectly centered on the handover cross.
Calculations:
IMGFEL |
Px / mm |
Position / px |
Position / mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dx |
0.715 |
3.56 |
2.5454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dy |
1.036 |
0.97 |
1.00492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tunnel positions |
L_z |
renormalized |
aperture shadow diameter / mm |
theor. Shadow diameter |
apparent offset in x / mm |
apparent offset in y / mm |
apparent offset in x / mm |
apparent offset in y / mm |
required offset to send the FEL on the same handover cross position but through the center of the 4mm aperture |
|
|
|
Cell1 upstream end |
2197 |
-97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell16 downstream end |
2294 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-1.99949886889298 |
|
|
|
ABSP4 |
2422.558 |
129 |
4 |
4.00 |
-0.97 |
0.37 |
-1.16 |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
IMGTR |
2576 |
282 |
7.1 |
8.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMGSR |
2586 |
292 |
8.5 |
9.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMGFEL |
2637 |
343 |
9 |
10.67 |
-2.6 |
1 |
-2.6 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Conclusions:
The 4mm aperture is misplaced by 0.97mm (x) and 0.37mm (y).
It should be moved dx = -0.97mm and dy = 0.37mm, or the FEL has to be made on a different trajectory. |
Attachment 1: JG_2023-01-21_16-06-48.png
|
|
Attachment 2: JG_IMGFEL_2023-01-21_16-21-01.png
|
|
Attachment 3: IMGFEL_no_cross_2023-01-21_16-27-22.png
|
|
Attachment 4: IMGFEL_with_cross_2023-01-21_16-30-16.png
|
|
4
|
17 Jan 2023, 10:25 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | Issue |
SASE3 peration issue - SOLVED
Controls issue, the machine cannot make beam in SASE3.
From BKR / DOOCS the problem description is: Big Brother is blocking SASE3 beam due to an EPS power limit of 0 Watt.
Looking into the SASE3 karabo topic, many devices are not instantiated, ATT #1.
The state of the PREABS preabsorber is not known and it is not found in the device topology either.
SA3_XTD10_PREABS/DCTRL/OPEN.off
SA3_XTD10_PREABS/SWITCH/OUT_BEAM_1.state
SA3_XTD10_PREABS/DCTRL/LED_POWER
SA3_XTD10_PREABS/DCTRL/OPEN.state
Info to DRC and PRCs.
Two actions resolved the issue for now:
- XO changed in karabo the EPS power limits to the values used before the WMP (40 W).
- PRC and VAC instantiated the EPS-loop PLC devices
If this fully resolves the problem will be known when the machine will try to make beam again (now switching to hybrid 10 Hz / 5 Hz mode).
Another small problem at BKR is that the 3 big wall monitors are now working (ticket to ITDM issued).
|
Attachment 1: JG_SASE3_no_beam_permission_2023-01-17_09-13-31.png
|
|
3
|
16 Jan 2023, 19:50 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | Issue |
Problem: Beam operation in SASE2 is prohibited by SEPS / MPS
Origin of problem: HED-CRL3
(this was already an issue during the past weekend)
HED (Karen) today realigned CRL3 and brought the lenses into the safe OUT state, see entry https://in.xfel.eu/elog/OPERATION-2023/2
In karabo then everything seemed find, SEPS switches all green / OUT, see ATT#1.
Nevertheless, in DOOCS the signal safety_HED_CRL_OPT was still red, see ATT#2.
The MPS safety_HED_CRL_OPT signal from the Beckhoff HED PLC was missing.
Onsite investigation by EEE (Leandro and Bernard) revealed that the Beckhoff crate BKF000476 was offline (switched off).
Switching the crate ON fixed the missing signal problem.
Presumably crate BKF00476 was not powered back on since after the planned power-cut in December 2022,
and because it is not part of PLC EtherCAT loop, the Nagios system didn't inform EEE about the crate status.
Result: Problem solved, beam operation in SASE2 can resume normally. |
Attachment 1: JG_2023-01-16_um_16.30.12.png
|
|
Attachment 2: JG_2023-01-16_um_16.30.50.png
|
|
2
|
16 Jan 2023, 16:01 |
karen appel | HED | CRL3: recalibration of y axis, test of x range and move to SEPS interlock trigger position |
CRL3 arm 2, 5 and 9 were mecanically religned to the V groove and retracted to some y position.
The y motor position was recalibrated by moving the motor to the lower limit switch, moving it up by 0.5 mm and then recalibrating the motor and encoder position to the former software limit position.
In that down position, the x range was tested by moving into the limit switches:
arm 2 x -1.213 to 0.824
arm 5 x -1.22 to 1.73
arm 9 x -0.32 to 2.256
The x limit switches were not changed and also the motor x axis were not recalibrated.
After that the x and y motors were moved to the x and y out position as stored in the CRL3 MDL. In that position, it was confirmed that all SEPS interlocks are triggered.
CRL3 is thus set-up for the SEPS testing, that will take place on the 24th of January.
|
1
|
16 Jan 2023, 11:33 |
Theophilos Maltezopoulos | XPD | Status |
I started the upstream XGMs in XTD2, XTD1, and XTD10. |