Group Selection Page HELP DOC Controls Group Data Analysis Group ITDM WP76 DET Vacuum XRO EEE WP78 WP74 FXE SCS SPB MID HED SQS SXP Sample Environment Photon Commissioning Team Operation PSPO XO TS
OPERATION-2024 OPERATION-2023 OPERATION-2022 OPERATION-2021 OPERATION-2020 OPERATION-2019 SASE1-2018 SASE1-2017 Experiment data
  OPERATION-2023 logbook, Contact: F.Wolff-Fabris, A.Galler, L.Samoylova, H.Sinn, Page 17 of 24  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
Entry   Late shift summary20.04.2023, posted by Robert Carley on 21 Apr 2023, 04:05 

Activities:

  • correctly positioned magnet
  • moved detector upstream and found small beamstop
  • Recorded SAXS
  • Started tr-SAXS

Problems:

  • The SAXS images from laser-excited samples showed unexpected variation between different size rings, central point (ie not a ring) and no scattering. 
Entry   Shift summary, posted by Wonhyuk Jo on 21 Apr 2023, 02:10 

Shift Summary

  1. Collected optical laser-induced dynamics in HfN and STO/SRO samples.
  2. Jungfrau detector transferred data without data dropping issue. 
Entry   Shift summary, posted by Romain Letrun on 20 Apr 2023, 06:58 

X-ray delivery

  • 12.0 keV, 1.3 mJ, 1-168 pulses @ 564 kHz.
  • Stable delivery.

Optical laser delivery

  • 1030 nm compressed, THG.
  • Stable delivery.

Achievements/Observations

  • Collected static and TR-SFX data.
Entry   Shift summary, posted by Wonhyuk Jo on 20 Apr 2023, 02:26 

Achieved

  1. Brought the 800 nm of optical pump laser to the hutch after the intervention. 
  2. Found the rough spatial and temporal overlap between the X-ray and pump laser with MID X-ray eye. 
  3. Found the sufficient photo-induced effect on the user sample (HfN) with one unpumped X-ray pulse and 12 pumped X-ray pulses. 
  4. Installed the lambda/2 wave plate and controlled the optical laser polarisation at the sample surface.
  5. Bragg peak analysis via Extrafoam provides an intuitive and prompt result during the measurement, which is very useful for deciding the following procedure of measurement. 
  6. A measurement scan for 3D reciprocal mapping has been collected using the Karabacon macro for varying the time delays and omega angles.

Issues

  1. The Jungfrau detector dropped approximately 60% of trains in the saved data.

Report

  1. The optical pump laser was not able to be brought to the first X-ray pulse. The first unpumped X-ray pulse data is used as a reference, which is useful to this experiment. 
Entry   shift summary day 2 UP3463, posted by Laurent Mercadier, Martin Teichmann on 19 Apr 2023, 23:20 

Achievements

  • found larger beamstop
  • found center of pinhole and bender settings for beam size
  • checked jitter of beam on grating, looks like jittering is large, to be further investigated offline
  • checked that patterns are working for the night, to be continued by night crew

Problems

  • Major problems with scanner Y, as during the previous runs. Reset axis, Reset and adjust the target position to actual position + move to get out of error.
  • Problem with bunch pattern (see separate entry in Operations elog)
  •  

 

Entry   Issue, posted by Laurent Mercadier on 19 Apr 2023, 17:51 bunch_pattern)issue_2023-04-19_17-37-10.png

We report on an issue regarding the bunch pattern: The bunch pattern read by SCS_RR_UTC/MDL/BUNCH_DECODER shows 48 pulses, but we instead use 50 pulses.

Currently, we have a separate RF window and our 1st pulse Id is 2604. We operate at 2.2 MHz, and as required, 50 pulses. See attachment 1.

This means that the last two pulse Ids are 2700 and 2702. However, these values exceed the number of pulses allowed, and the way the bunch pattern is read (SCS_RR_UTC/TSYS/TIMESERVER:outputBunchPattern,
and the middle layer SCS_RR_UTC/MDL/BUNCH_DECODER) cast the array to 2700 values, so that the number of pulses read is 48 instead of actual 50.

We confirm that we indeed have 50 pulses, as seen by the XGM and by photodiode traces showing 50 peaks.

Since our data analysis strongly relies on the bunchpattern table, this is a critical issue.

For now, the users agreed to use 48 pulses instead of 50 pulses to facilitate the data analysis, but this issue should be investigated.

 

DOC was called, ITDM is aware and helped finding the reason.

 

edit 20 Apr 2023, 16:26 : redmine ticket https://redmine.xfel.eu/issues/151949

 

Entry   Shift summary, posted by Romain Letrun on 19 Apr 2023, 07:04 

X-ray delivery

  • 12.0 keV, 1.3 mJ, 1-168 pulses @ 564 kHz
  • Decaying intensity between 1:20 and 2:40, otherwise stable delivery.

Optical laser delivery

  • 1030 nm compressed, THG
  • Stable delivery

Achievements/Observations

  • Optimised PP laser THG conversion efficiency.
  • PP laser spatial and temporal overlap with water jet.
  • Collected lysozyme diffraction for detector geometry.
Entry   Shift summary , posted by Wonhyuk Jo on 19 Apr 2023, 02:14 

Achieved

  1. Brought the X-ray to the end of the beamline. 
  2. Aligned the goneometer with a pin. 
  3. Found the timing of AGIPD at the detector distance of about 3.4 m from the sample.
  4. Found the timing of Jungfrau detector in burst mode.
  5. Measured the X-ray beam size at the sample position with the X-ray eye for two combinations of CRL 2 (e.g., CRL2 3,4,7 : 14 um x 19 um, CRL2 3,7: 28 um x 34 um ).
  6. Collected some x-ray scattering data from the thin film HfN on the Sapphire substrate.
  7. Bragg peak analysis via Extraform is running with 16 X-ray pulses per train.
  8. The HIREX gave the energy bandwidth of the self-seeding spectrum about 0.71 pixels. 

Issues

  1. The rotation motor of MID spectrometer is frequently stuck. The ticket number is #151832
  2. The data calibration pipeline of AGIPD sometimes goes into an error state. It could be related to the XGM data. The ticket number is #151837
  3. XTD1 attenuator controller and the watchdog device didn’t behave correctly and died in a few minutes. After that, it removed the attenuator itself without any notice. It could have damaged anything very seriously. 
  4. The optical pump laser has had some issues with hardware failure (piezo mirror) since 11:25 today.  The laser group fixed the issues, but the system requires some time to be stabilized until tomorrow morning. It might need more time based on the measurement result tomorrow morning. 
Entry   summary late shift day 1, posted by Laurent Mercadier, Martin Teichmann on 18 Apr 2023, 23:01 

Achievements

  • knife edge scans of FEL beam, 30 um x 30 um beam size
  • aligned beam stop in front of camera
  • triggering pattern tested and works, still need to test with laser and XGM

Problems

  • Y motor of beam stop doesn't reach the desired up position
    • had to move the entire camera instead
  • Once or twice scanner Y got into error during knife edge scan, resetting the target position to the actual position and pressing move helps.
  •  
Entry   shift summary EulerMDL calibration, posted by Antje Trapp on 16 Apr 2023, 23:06 11x

First four pictures: beam line status at beginning of shift - Beam aligned to MID

Idea is to check M2 parasitic motions again on M3 popin. therefore bringing M2 close to 0 with all vertical motors and Tx as much as possible without using beam on the popin.

Adjusting M1 pitch with it

Approch - drive roll and correct rz offest to stay in at the same horizontal position - adjust also ROLL Offset to show 0 in middle position

When ROLL IS DONE continuE with rx and then ty

offset calibration needs iteration. We started the second iteration but could not finish.

Other pictures: documentation of calibration process

Entry   Shift summary, posted by Silja Schmidtchen on 16 Apr 2023, 15:35 

shift summary from Saturday 15.04.2023:

Tasks:

- Calibration of Euler MDL

- Vibrometer measurements at M3 using the RY piezo

Beam was aligned to MID popin

we used values stored in MID setpoints 'B' but went there manually, using the EulerMDL

M1 - X value was corrected, as we found the center of the beam/mirror to be at 6.4mm - calculated beam angle after M1 is 2.14mrad

M2 - values slightly differ from saved setpoints but were quite well met using EulerMDL to reach the same beam position

M3 - we had to remove it a bit further from the beam, as it seemed to intercept it, when we first tried to get the beam through. This might in the end not have been necessary

End of shift:

beam aligned to MID

preabsorber in

SRA fully open

Entry   Shift summary, posted by Maurizio Vannoni on 16 Apr 2023, 07:00 

Update of the damage tests at SQS.

Yesterday (15.04) SQS staff created a focused beam on our sample using a small YAG fragment we have placed on the holder.

Due to the unusual position, the beam is full of aberrations but it looked small enough for our purpose. Estimattion of the size is difficult atm but it is our intention to measure it with imprints.

We managed to align the sample 1 (silicon, uncoated) in grazing incidence at 19 mrad and found the damage threshold at current focusing conditions at around 100 uJoule (looking on the SQS XGM).

We managed to align also on sample 2 (silicon, B$C coated) at the same grazing angle and we found a threshold at around 200 uJoule.

We started to do systematic spots at various energies, using the GATT

One difficulty is that the manipulator is not enough precise to scan several mms in grazing incidence, the sample has to be realigned along the scan and we cannot find a clear centering on the sample due to the lack of reproducibility.

In the late shift we started to do imprints to characterise the beam spot.

Overall the experiment is on a very good status. Until now, we explored only single pulse damage. Today (16.04) we will try multipulse damage and single pulse damage at 9 mrad.

 

Today we comtinued the program, changing to 9mrad amd 15mrad and doing also multipulse. We had a short interruption at around 15 to extract some samples and to realign Sample 3.

 

Entry   Shift end, posted by Jan Gruenert on 13 Apr 2023, 15:57 

End of Diamond Sensor Study

We leave the SASE2 beamline in the following safe state:

  • Pre-Abs inserted
  • Solid ATT with T=0.001
  • All CRLs OUT
  • All imagers OUT
Entry   Issue, posted by Andreas Koch on 13 Apr 2023, 15:29 

Trigger issue with SXP_XTD10_IMGES - Exit Slit imager

The external trigger of the Navitar camera was not set, fixed now.
The single pulse trigger of the imager: MCP + camera is tested and correctly working.
The pre-settings are stored in Karabo and should come up again, also after Karabo updates.

Entry   Issue, posted by Jan Gruenert on 10 Apr 2023, 02:25 

REPAIRED / FIXED

Problem: The imager SPB_XTD9_IMGPII45 insertion motor lost steps and kept the machine to maximum 2 bunches per train.
Mitigation by DOC/EEE/PRC on 8 April 2023: made sure that screen seems actually out of beam and took imager out of interlock condition.
Repair by XPD on 10 April 2023 02h15: 
a) recalibrated OUT position.
b) verified that EPS-OUT switch shows green when moving to OUT position in MDL.
c) put back the imager into the interlock conditions.
d) communication with BKR before and after the intervention (SPB and FXE didn't use the beam).
Repair instruction see: https://in.xfel.eu/elog/SASE1+technical+commissioning/2065

Entry   SPB_XTD9_IMGPII45 lost steps - REPAIRED, posted by Jan Gruenert on 10 Apr 2023, 02:16 

REPAIRED / FIXED

Problem: The imager SPB_XTD9_IMGPII45 insertion motor lost steps and kept the machine to maximum 2 bunches per train.
Mitigation by DOC/EEE/PRC on 8 April 2023: made sure that screen seems actually out of beam and took imager out of interlock condition.
"Repair" by XPD on 10 April 2023 02h15:
a) recalibrated OUT position.
b) verified that EPS-OUT switch shows green when moving to OUT position in MDL.
c) put back the imager into the interlock conditions.
d) communication with BKR before and after the intervention (SPB and FXE didn't use the beam).
Repair instruction see: https://in.xfel.eu/elog/SASE1+technical+commissioning/2065

Entry   Shift summary HED 2022-0, posted by Motoaki Nakatsutsumi on 09 Apr 2023, 00:03 

9.752 keV, self-seeding, 700-800 uJ.  Intensity is very stable, ponting is also much stable than usual. very good beam.

Beamtime #3326 - Axion search.

Successfully aligned two Ge crystals to Laue conditions (Rocking curve width ~0.002 deg) . Found Laue reflections after 2 crystals on Jungfrau detector.

We realized that the Xeryon rotation stages used for rotation of stage was wrongly calibrated (1 deg was not 1 deg), which caused some confusion. But we found a workaround solution. Still, we doubt about the repeatability and stability of the stage.

The biggest issue was that we lost the Laue reflection very quickly when we put a full intensity onto the crystal. The beam size is about 500 um FWHM. The Bragg angle at the heated sample fluctuate (does not go toward a single value).

We tested several different x-ray intensities to find the optimum flux where the Bragg condition stays. It seems, if we go to 0.1% transmission, the decay time is about 20 - 30min, which may be good enough for data.

We also discussed on swiching back to SASE. As the fluctuation of the Bragg angle seems to be  < 0.02 deg, which would be covered by  the SASE bandwidth. But, that means the photon energy goes to the second crystal fluctuate, then we lose the Laue reflection from the second crystal - probably going to SASE doesn't solve the  issue. This is the current situation.

We called DOC - Optics hutch attenuation stopped working - solved. Jungfrau2 data cannot be taken by DAQ - we decided not to solve this issue as JF2 is not necessary for this beamtime any more.

 

Entry   Issue, posted by Yifeng Jiang on 08 Apr 2023, 23:44 2023-04-08-234240_066894160_exflqr51474.png2023-04-08-234217_329678202_exflqr51474.png

We notice that 0.5 mm Silicon ATT in SASE1 causes holo beam profile in FEL imager. Maybe this silicon att has been damaged.

Entry   Shift summary, posted by Johan Bielecki on 08 Apr 2023, 22:52 

Beam delivery for proposal 3378

Achievements/Observations

  • Collected large amounts of data for the user program on water crystallisation and angular correlations

To do for next shift:

Continue taking data

Entry   Issue, posted by Andreas Galler on 08 Apr 2023, 10:29 

Changed EPS Interlock condition for SPB_XTD9_IMGPI/SWITCH/SCREEN_OUT

SPB/SFX called DOC this morning for being limitied to two pulses by the EPS (Instrument should have called PRC instead)
After tracing the issue to the SPB_XTD9_IMGPI/SWITCH/SCREEN_OUT switch SPB/SFX decided to take this imager out of the interlock, confirming on camera that no screen was inserted.
EEE and DOC investigated the issue without conclusion https://redmine.xfel.eu/issues/151238
 

SPB_XTD9_IMGPI/SWITCH/SCREEN_OUT disabled in EPS Mode30 and Mode400
for todays SPB/SFX shift we'll keep it like this, PRC will check with FXE when they take over at 23:00

ELOG V3.1.4-7c3fd00