X-ray delivery

• 6 keV, 2.6 mJ/pulse, stable delivery

Optical laser delivery

• 800nm PP laser, stable delivery

Achievements/Observations

• NKB focus optimized and PSLITS optimized
• Beam going through IBS camera
• PP laser rough timing checked w.r.t. X-ray
• Catcher and injector motors (X, Z) are aligned well with about 1.5mm offset in X

Issues

• Manifold-MDL issue (reported in Issues tap)
• SPB_IRU_LIQUIDJET/CAM/1 (IRU nozzle insertion camera) is not working. Power cycle required.
• SPB_EHU_Valve closed 2-3 times due to vacuum interlock
• Space (KF50 pipes) in the super-structure was too long for the user injector (nozzle rod). After taking off small spacer, nozzle is very close to the injector valve during insertion. Please check it out whether we can find any better solution or not.

We checked the XTD2 attenuators following the intervention from XRO (compar ewith elog:37, before the intervention).

The wavefront shows similar distortions with the 75 and 150 um as earlier, which is not too surprising since the cracks are vertical.

Attachments 1-5: Beam on SPB_XTD9_SCR with XTD2 attenuator CVDs

Attachments 6-7: Beam on FEL imager with XTD2 75 and 150 um CVDs

• 10 keV beam
• Detector: JUNGFRAU in the burst mode (16 memory cells)
• Achievements:
  • multiple sfx data sets (lysozyme) with 4 and 8 pulses (at 1.1MHz) per exposure taken

The number of bunches during the last night shift kept being changed down to 24 by the device SA1_XTD2_WATCHDOG/MDL/ATT1_MONITOR020 acting on SA1_XTD2_BUNCHPATTERN/MDL/CONFIGURATOR. This was not the case during the previous shifts, even though the pulse energy was comparable. Looking at the history of SA1_XTD2_WATCHDOG/MDL/ATT1_MONITOR020, it looks like this device was started at 16:26:25 on Friday, 1st March.

-Machine status

the cold compressor failure occurred at ~16.30hr today. And it will take around 35 hr to fix it. I will update via email (local contacts for experiments) and Operation Elog tomorrow with more details.

Naresh

X-ray delivery

• 10 keV, up to 128 pulses with custom bunch pattern, 1.6-2.0 mJ

Optical laser delivery

• NA

Achievements/Observations

• Collected first SFX data, but background on JUNGFRAU is rather high and needs further optimisation.

Issues

• AGIPD having frequent problems with both MFPGAs (once even both at the same time). Frequent restarts were needed.
• Horizontal drift of the beam pointing.

X-ray delivery

• 10 keV, up to 160 pulses at 1.1MHz, 1.8 mJ

Optical laser delivery

• NA

Achievements/Observations

• Instrument aligned up to IRDa at 10 keV.
• Focus optimised.
• JUNGFRAU timed.

Issues

• We could only start using the beam at 1 am.
• More mirror movement needed to get the beam down the instrument than expected.
• Several AGIPD power cycling needed due to issues with MFPGA2

Stable seeding with 1mJ + 400mJ SASE
HIREX triggered interlock when all attenuators are removed 
successful test of nano focusing setup
successful test and alignment of x-ray microscopes
Alignment of split and delay line
Laser x-ray timing at sample position

5.61 keV setpoint in SA1 was confirmed to correspond to 5.660 keV (+/- 0.003 keV), see attached.

The user expt #5644 can proceed as planned.

Not sure if this is the cause of the fringes reported before, but at 5.6 keV there are clear cracks visible on the XTD2 Attenuators 75 umm and 150um CVD, see attached. There is also a little bit of damage on the 600 um CVD, but not as strong as the others.

At 5.6 keV we will need to use the thin attenuators. I will mention again in case this causes problems downstream.

Edit 8:50h: We do not observe additional interference effects in the downstream beam profile (see attachement 4)

The status of the XTD2 attenuators has been checked during the experiment last week and many were found to cause disturbances in the wavefront ranging from mild to severe.

Attachment 1: No attenuator
Attachment 2: 75 um CVD - Fringes visible in beam
Attachment 3: 150 um CVD - Strong fringes in beam
Attachment 4: 300 um CVD - Looks more or less ok
Attachment 5: 600 um CVD - Weak distortion in the beam profile
Attachment 6: 1200 um CVD - Ok
Attachment 7: 2400 um CVD - Ok
Attachment 8: 500 um Si - Not ok

Shift summary for 2024-02-25 from 11:00 to 2024-02-25 at 14:00:

Self-seeding at 8.5 keV, with approximately 500 μJ per pulse. 

Overall, the performance of x-ray self-seeding remains good, and users are happy. Pointing stability is also exceptional. However, enhancing photon energy slightly (600 uJ as we had yesterday) would further improve the signal-to-noise ratio.

Key Achievements and Current Challenges:

1. Ongoing data accumulation.
2. Issue with the sample motor (stepper motor). The encoder ceases to update values although the motor is actually moving. While a temporary workaround has been implemented, a thorough investigation is needed post-beamtime. More details: [Link]

X-ray delivery

• 9.10 keV; 190 pulses per train @1.1 MHz with roughly 170-200 uJ; stable delivery

Optical laser delivery

• ns laser for particles visualization

Achievements/Observations

• Sample injection and data collection for ~11 hours
• collected data on copper cubes with better hit rates than previous shifts; ~15%

Issues

• We had laser interlock issues, the magnet in door went to error state and this was fixed by Klaus Witt call around 22:15.
• data migration issues; it was very slow and DOC did not figure out the cause for this.

Shift summary for 2024-02-24 from 07:00 to 2024-02-25 at 14:00:

Self-seeding at 8.5 keV, with approximately 500 μJ per pulse. Following re-tuning around 10 am on the 25th, the energy per pulse increased to around 600 μJ.

The x-ray intensity and pointing stability have been excellent, resulting in a substantial amount of data being acquired by users just two days into the beamtime. Users have expressed satisfaction with the performance thus far.

There were a couple of brief beam downtimes, but they had minimal impact on beamline operations.

Achievements:

• Successful laser delay scan (0 - 1000 ps) of wire compression dynamics under ultra-intense laser interaction (>10^21 W.cm-2).
• Nanofocus Z scan imaging completed.
• Online analysis tools (DAMNIT) are functioning properly.
• Some minor issues with the automatic shot procedure using MDL were encountered but mostly resolved.
• Ongoing issues persist with the off-axis-parabola mirror X axis (motor movement not stopping), which will require follow-up after the beamtime.
• A minor issue was identified with laser timing jumps, possibly stemming from a trainID distribution issue with the ToD system. Increasing the sequence delay of the master timer from 10 to 30 appears to have mitigated this problem.

X-ray delivery
9.10 keV; 190 pulses per train @1.1 MHz with roughly 140-200 uJ; observed some fluctuation in the photon flux

Optical laser delivery
ns laser for particles visualization

Achievements/Observations

• Beam optimization and characterization
• X-ray focus FWHM calculation found to have a bug in pixel size used
• Sample injection and data collection for >10 hours
• collected data on copper cubes with average hit rates of ~5%

Issues

• DAQ - multiple crashes and restarts needed throughout the shift; at certain point we encountered three crashes within less than an hour; and called DAQ to intervene
• Gotthard II at Hirex stopped acquiring and we had to change the number of the acquisition time to ~10 days to allow continuous running until the end of the beamtime.
• hit rates were low and sonication of samples needed to be done several time to prevent clogging issues
• Focus drift - we observed significant drift in the beam; a refocus then had to be check several times to focus back the beam to nm
• beam intensity fluctuated a lot during the shift

Shift summary 2024-02-23 07:00 - 2024-02-24 10:00

We got self-seeding at 8.5 keV very quickly after changeover from 10.5 keV operation finished at 2024-02-23 07:00.
Pulse energy ~ 600 uJ. 

Progress is in general good. Most of planned tasks for the day are done.
We called BKR whether we can get a bit more energy/pulse this morning, but it appears difficult. Otherwise, having a bit more energy would be helpful to have enough signal-to-noise ratio for X-ray imaging. 

Achievements: 

• Insert nanofocus lens, pump IC1 sample chamber into vacuum
• Establish X-ray axis, measure source point and divergence
• Set up the CRL scheme overfilling CRL4b nanofocus (the settings used in Feb at 8.2 keV were CRL1 arm 3,5 and CRL2 arm 1)
• Bring the imaging systems to the X-ray axis
• Focus and calibrate the x-ray spectrometers
• Laser-xray timing verified on YAG
• DAMNIT setup 
• Nanofocus imaging optimization (Z-scans) with Cu 25um wire and Siemens star
  • Best focus was identified
• Sample alignment 

X-ray delivery:

stable and flat over 190 pulses per train. 1.1 MHz with ~200 uJ

Optical laser delivery:

NA

Achievements/Observations:

Beam optimization and characterization
Sample injection and data collection for ~10 hours

reasonable hit rates observed but highly fluctuating, making alignment optimisation slow

Issues:
DAQ - restarts needed throughout the shift
Sample injection - copper samples dont give high hit rate and increaseing sample concentration led to clogging
Focus drift - focus was tuned at around 3:30 pm ( from 4 um back to 1.5 um)
-again at 19:30 when we checked again focus was >2microns FWHM returned to 1.5

X-ray delivery: stable and flat over 190 pulses per train. 1.1 MHz with 200 uJ short intervention needed to improve intensity after it dropped

Optical laser delivery: NA

Achievements/Observations:

• Beam optimization and characterization
  - Short pulses tuned and number of spikes reduced
• X-ray focus FWHM calculation found to have a bug in pixel size used
  - rest to 0.2 FWHM of focused beam now better than 1.5 microns
• Laser illumination installed to enable particle visualization to aid alignment and feedback
• Sample injection and data collection for several hours
  - Hits seen from Silver cubes
  - very low hit rate from copper
  - cubes, and spheres

Issues:

• DAQ - multiple crashes and restarts needed throughout the shift
• Proc pipeline - some runs fail to processwhile adjacent runs collected with same conditions (run repeater) process without errors
• Sample injection - copper samples continue to be difficult to inject
  - very low hit rates (few hits seen per run)
  - clogging issues
• Focus drift - focus was tuned at around 3 pm, by 9 when we could check again focus was >3 microns FWHM
• Beam intensity reduced during the shift and BKR needed to tune it back
  - returned intensity to 200 uJ - they asked if we wanted to continue but did not as this could have resulted in more SASE spikes