Group Selection Page HELP DOC Controls Group Data Analysis Group ITDM WP76 DET Vacuum XRO EEE WP78 WP74 FXE SCS SPB MID HED SQS SXP Sample Environment Photon Commissioning Team Operation PSPO XO TS
OPERATION-2024 OPERATION-2023 OPERATION-2022 OPERATION-2021 OPERATION-2020 OPERATION-2019 SASE1-2018 SASE1-2017 Experiment data
  OPERATION-2023 logbook, Contact: F.Wolff-Fabris, A.Galler, L.Samoylova, H.Sinn, Page 24 of 24  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Datedown Author Group Subject
  7   23 Jan 2023, 10:43 Jan GruenertPRCStatus

Status of machine SASE tuning (just before switching off for monday maintenance):

11.5 GeV operation SASE1 SASE2 SASE3
Photon energy 7 keV 7 keV 700 eV
Max. obtained average pulse energy 3.25 mJ 1.35 mJ 5.8 mJ
FEL pointing confirmed on IMGFEL handover cross ?   YES  

 

Attachment 1: JG_2023-01-23_um_10.04.56.png
JG_2023-01-23_um_10.04.56.png
  6   22 Jan 2023, 18:40 Jan GruenertPRCIssue

SASE1 blocked to 1 bunch/train by EPS interlock (sic, not 2 but 1) --- PARTIALLY RESOLVED

Several issues:

1) MODEM device is broken, in state UNKNOWN, see ATT#1 and ATT#2. Fixed with deinstatiating and then using BECKHOFF_ASSISTANT to re-instantiate. --> ATT#3

2) Several devices in XTD9 are causing that MODES is interlocked: I restart broken devices of the FXE-PBLM and SPB-PBLM.
Then there is a broken MDL of SPB_XTD9_SCR called SPB_XTD9_SCR/MDL/BIU. This MDL is not in the SA1-topic system topology but shown with (X) on the SA1_MAIN scene, and this screen is blocking the interlock (see ATT#4)

SPB_XTD9_SCR/VSWITCH/HOLSTER_X_LIMITL is triggering the interlock SA1_SYS_EPS2MPS/DCTRL/MODES and causing that the machine cannot go to more than 2 bunches per train.
Even when going to SPB-topic this issue cannot be solved - all devices in SPB-topic related to this SCR seem fine.

3) To allow SASE1 tuning by the machine, BKR is closing shutter XS3. This avoids any beam into XTD9, resolved the interlock problem and allows the machine to continue SASE tuning.

4) We don't know what had blocked the beam not only to 2 but actually to 1 bunch / train (no traces of problems in Big Brother).

 

Attachment 1: JG_2023-01-22_um_17.43.36.png
JG_2023-01-22_um_17.43.36.png
Attachment 2: JG_2023-01-22_um_18.17.31.png
JG_2023-01-22_um_18.17.31.png
Attachment 3: JG_2023-01-22_um_18.23.20.png
JG_2023-01-22_um_18.23.20.png
Attachment 4: JG_2023-01-22_um_18_1.37.21.png
JG_2023-01-22_um_18_1.37.21.png
  5   21 Jan 2023, 16:38 Jan GruenertXPDAnalyze and quantify the mispositioning of the new 4mm-aperture behind the undulator

Goal: Analyze and quantify the mispositioning of the new 4mm-aperture behind the undulator

Positions in tunnel:

  • ABSP4.2422.SA2 = ABSP4.CELL37.SA2 L_z position 2422.558m
  • Last closed undulator for this test is cell16 at 2294m (at end of segment) = SR radiation source point
  • IMGTR = 2576m (BT=181.1m, PD=582.0m).
  • IMGSR = 2586m (BT=191.6m, PD=591.5m).
  • IMGFEL = 2637m (BT=242.0m, PD=642,8m).
  • Sequence: end-of-cell16 -- ABSP4 -

Measurements:

  • IMGTR : dX=15.15-8.25=6.9mm. dY=17-9.8=7.2mm. Aperture shadow mean diameter = 7.1mm
  • IMGSR : Aperture shadow mean diameter = ca. 8.5 mm
  • IMGFEL : Aperture shadow mean diameter = 9.0 mm.
    The handover cross is at dy = +1.0mm (up) and dx = -2.6mm (left) relative to the apparent center of the aperture shadow.

Comments to the screenshots:

  • The handover cross on the IMGFEL cannot be seen simultaneously with the weak SR background because it has the color scaled to high intensity beam.
  • The FEL beam spot is almost perfectly centered on the handover cross.

Calculations:

IMGFEL Px / mm Position / px Position / mm                  
dx 0.715 3.56 2.5454                  
dy 1.036 0.97 1.00492                  
                         
Tunnel positions L_z renormalized aperture shadow diameter / mm theor. Shadow diameter apparent offset in x / mm apparent offset in y / mm apparent offset in x / mm apparent offset in y / mm required offset to send the FEL on the same handover cross position but through the center of the 4mm aperture      
Cell1 upstream end 2197 -97                    
Cell16 downstream end 2294 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 -1.99949886889298      
ABSP4 2422.558 129 4 4.00 -0.97 0.37 -1.16 0.44        
IMGTR 2576 282 7.1 8.77                
IMGSR 2586 292 8.5 9.09                
IMGFEL 2637 343 9 10.67 -2.6 1 -2.6 1      

 

Conclusions:

The 4mm aperture is misplaced by 0.97mm (x) and 0.37mm (y).
It should be moved dx = -0.97mm and dy = 0.37mm, or the FEL has to be made on a different trajectory.

Attachment 1: JG_2023-01-21_16-06-48.png
JG_2023-01-21_16-06-48.png
Attachment 2: JG_IMGFEL_2023-01-21_16-21-01.png
JG_IMGFEL_2023-01-21_16-21-01.png
Attachment 3: IMGFEL_no_cross_2023-01-21_16-27-22.png
IMGFEL_no_cross_2023-01-21_16-27-22.png
Attachment 4: IMGFEL_with_cross_2023-01-21_16-30-16.png
IMGFEL_with_cross_2023-01-21_16-30-16.png
  4   17 Jan 2023, 10:25 Jan GruenertPRCIssue
SASE3 peration issue - SOLVED
 
Controls issue, the machine cannot make beam in SASE3.
From BKR / DOOCS the problem description is: Big Brother is blocking SASE3 beam due to an EPS power limit of 0 Watt.

Looking into the SASE3 karabo topic, many devices are not instantiated, ATT #1.
The state of the PREABS  preabsorber is not known and it is not found in the device topology either.
 
SA3_XTD10_PREABS/DCTRL/OPEN.off
SA3_XTD10_PREABS/SWITCH/OUT_BEAM_1.state
SA3_XTD10_PREABS/DCTRL/LED_POWER
SA3_XTD10_PREABS/DCTRL/OPEN.state
 
Info to DRC and PRCs.
Two actions resolved the issue for now:
- XO changed in karabo the EPS power limits to the values used before the WMP (40 W).
- PRC and VAC instantiated the EPS-loop PLC devices
 
If this fully resolves the problem will be known when the machine will try to make beam again (now switching to hybrid 10 Hz / 5 Hz mode).
 
Another small problem at BKR is that the 3 big wall monitors are now working (ticket to ITDM issued).
Attachment 1: JG_SASE3_no_beam_permission_2023-01-17_09-13-31.png
JG_SASE3_no_beam_permission_2023-01-17_09-13-31.png
  3   16 Jan 2023, 19:50 Jan GruenertPRCIssue

Problem: Beam operation in SASE2 is prohibited by SEPS / MPS
Origin of problem: HED-CRL3
(this was already an issue during the past weekend)

HED (Karen) today realigned CRL3 and brought the lenses into the safe OUT state, see entry https://in.xfel.eu/elog/OPERATION-2023/2
In karabo then everything seemed find, SEPS switches all green / OUT, see ATT#1.
Nevertheless, in DOOCS the signal safety_HED_CRL_OPT was still red, see ATT#2.

The MPS safety_HED_CRL_OPT signal from the Beckhoff HED PLC was missing.
Onsite investigation by EEE (Leandro and Bernard) revealed that the Beckhoff crate BKF000476 was offline (switched off).
Switching the crate ON fixed the missing signal problem.

Presumably crate BKF00476 was not powered back on since after the planned power-cut in December 2022,
and because it is not part of PLC EtherCAT loop, the Nagios system didn't inform EEE about the crate status.

Result: Problem solved, beam operation in SASE2 can resume normally.

Attachment 1: JG_2023-01-16_um_16.30.12.png
JG_2023-01-16_um_16.30.12.png
Attachment 2: JG_2023-01-16_um_16.30.50.png
JG_2023-01-16_um_16.30.50.png
  2   16 Jan 2023, 16:01 karen appelHEDCRL3: recalibration of y axis, test of x range and move to SEPS interlock trigger position

CRL3 arm 2, 5 and 9 were mecanically religned to the V groove and retracted to some y position.

The y motor position was recalibrated by moving the motor to the lower limit switch, moving it up by 0.5 mm and then recalibrating the motor and encoder position to the former software limit position.

In that down position, the x range was tested by moving into the limit switches:

arm 2 x -1.213 to 0.824

arm 5 x -1.22 to 1.73

arm 9 x -0.32 to 2.256

The x limit switches were not changed and also the motor x axis were not recalibrated.

After that the x and y motors were moved to the x and y out position as stored in the CRL3 MDL. In that position, it was confirmed that all SEPS interlocks are triggered.

CRL3 is thus set-up for the SEPS testing, that will take place on the 24th of January.

 

 

  1   16 Jan 2023, 11:33 Theophilos MaltezopoulosXPDStatus

I started the upstream XGMs in XTD2, XTD1, and XTD10.

  468   26 Nov 2022, 10:40 Wolfgang FreundXPDDiamond detector / DDM commissioning

beam: 30 keV / 30 uJ
reduce to single bunch for insertion
put FEL imager in
put DD into beam at X=178 mm
we found the signal
centering the DD by minimising the diffrence signal

Bias voltage = 40 V

when moving Y there seems to be some mechanical bending of the detector holder. The position reached the negative end of the range (approx. -9 mm).
When moving out and in again we could find the beam at:
X= 178.629 (centred)
Y= -3.48 (close to center)
see screenshot

run 29 with DD and IMGFEL
 

The aperture was opened by moving the slits from 2x2 to 4x4 mm

switch to 2 bunches

screenshot

try to center Y position

stop run 29

run 30: approx. 5 min at this position

change FEL-imager ND filter to 0.9 to avoid saturation
run31

 

take IMGFEL out and switch to 50 bunches
actual X center = 178.44

move left until we loose the signal and scan x from 176.5 to 179.9
y signal changes -> mechanical coupling
run 32

in order to center the Y position we had to move 2 mm down to -5.53

run 33:
move left until we loose the signal and scan x from 176.5 to 179.9
y signal changes

Now the center of y seems to be at -2.88 mm

Image was observed with FEL YAG imager, x movement does not result in a horizontal motion but it is some sort of a diagonal motion

After some movements the y center is now at -5.23 mm

After a new try the y center is at -3.37 mm

Due to the mechanical problem with the Y-position we do the scan with the K-mono chamber X-motor

-----
see elogs from Jan and Tuba

-----

Sascha made an orbit kick with 150 bunches
due to some numerical problem the kick is disturbed (see screenshot)
DD can reproduce the kick trace
take run 40

Sascha altered the orbit again 150 bunches
https://ttfinfo.desy.de/XFELelog/show.jsp?dir=/2022/47/26.11_a&pos=2022-11-26T17:20:00
(see attached graph)
take run 41

set bias from 40 V to 100 V

run 42

Bias set to 40 V again

beam changed to 27 keV

x-calibration scan from 8.3 to 11.7 (K-mono X)
run 43

Bias -> 100 V
run 44 (as before)

Bias -> 20 V
run 45

Suspicion: beam is touching K-mono setup
move K-mono chamber to X=4.6 mm and move DDM X to 173.55
Y again has to be adjusted, is now -3.18

bias set to 40 V

scan K-mono X from 3.1 to 6.1
run 46

bias runs: see Tuba's elog

 

Attachment 1: DDM_inserted_Screenshot_from_2022-11-26_13-10-03.png
DDM_inserted_Screenshot_from_2022-11-26_13-10-03.png
Attachment 2: DD_2_pulses_IMGFEL_Screenshot_from_2022-11-26_13-32-47.png
DD_2_pulses_IMGFEL_Screenshot_from_2022-11-26_13-32-47.png
Attachment 3: 2022-11-26T17_20_00-01.png
2022-11-26T17_20_00-01.png
Attachment 4: DD_27keV_Screenshot_from_2022-11-26_18-12-30.png
DD_27keV_Screenshot_from_2022-11-26_18-12-30.png
Attachment 5: 2022-11-26T17_11_18-00_orbit_kick_for_run_40.png
2022-11-26T17_11_18-00_orbit_kick_for_run_40.png
  19   29 Oct 2022, 11:03 Jaydeep Patel Jet alignment test- obeserver

Nozzle type

Nozzle Aperture(µm)

Sample

Jet Speed(m/s)

He flow rate

Liquid flow rate

Repetition rate

 

      Beam Attenuation

(%)

 

Run No.

GDVN

B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

Water

 

25

10

80

0.5

122

30

13

60

0.5

9

123

40

20

30

0.5

23

124

45

25

30

0.5

23

125

50

32

30

0.5

23

126

Buffer 1

 

25

10

80

0.5

31

141

30

14

60

0.5

31

140

40

20

30

0.5

31

139

45

26

30

0.5

31

138

50

32

30

0.5

9

137

Buffer 2

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

Crystal size 1µm

25

10

80

0.5

16

131

30

13

60

0.5

16

130

40

20

30

0.5

16

129

45

25

30

0.5

16

128

50

32

30

0.5

16

127

Crystal size 2-4µm

25

10

80

0.5

12

132

30

13

60

0.5

9

133

40

20

30

0.5

9

134

45

25

30

0.5

9

135

50

32

30

0.5

9

136

Crystal size 5 µm

25

10

80

0.5

9

142

30

13

60

0.5

9

143

40

20

30

0.5

31

144

45

25

30

0.5

29

145

50

32

30

0.5

29

146

DFFN

JKMH8.11

 

8.11=75-70-70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

water

25

13

80

0.5

 

 

30

13

40

0.5

 

 

40

20

20

0.5

 

 

45

25

15

0.5

 

 

50

32

15

0.5

 

 

Buffer1

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

Buffer2

25

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

Crystal size 1 µm

25

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

Crystal size 2-4 µm

25

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

Crystal size 5 µm

25

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

GDVN

C/C4

 

C=100-90-100

C4=100-75-100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

Water

26

15

80

0.5

58%

172

30

 20

 60

0.5

58%

171

40

35

25

0.5

58%

170

45

37

 25

0.5

58%

174

50

 40

18

0.5

58%

175

Buffer 1

26

 

 

 

 

180

30

 

 

 

 

179

40

 

 

 

 

178

45

 

 

 

 

177

50

 

 

 

 

176

Buffer 2

25

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

Crystal size 1 µm

25

 

 

 

31%

181

30

 

 

 

31%

182

40

 

 

 

31%

183

45

 

 

 

31%

184

50

 

 

 

31%

 

185

Crystal size 2-4 µm

25

 

 

 

31%

187

30

 

 

 

31%

188

40

 

 

 

31%

189

45

X

X

X

X

X

50

X

X

X

X

X

Crystal size 5 µm

25

20

80

0.5

16/ 31%

147/190c4

30

30

60

0.5

31%

192

40

40

25

0.5

31%

193

45

40

15

0.5

 

 

50

40

10

0.5

 

 

ELOG V3.1.4-7c3fd00