Group Selection Page HELP Controls Group Data Analysis Group ITDM WP76 DET Vacuum EEE WP78 WP74 FXE SCS SPB MID HED SQS SXP Sample Environment Operation PSPO XO TS Migrated2Zulip
OPERATION-2025 OPERATION-2024 OPERATION-2023 OPERATION-2022 OPERATION-2021 OPERATION-2020 OPERATION-2019 SASE1-2018 SASE1-2017 Experiment data
  OPERATION-2024 logbook, Contact: F.Wolff-Fabris, A.Galler, H.Sinn, Page 1 of 12  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Group Subjectdown
  79   10 Apr 2024, 16:35 Antje TrappXROstart of shift - status

Starting shift with mirror motor calibration:

- beam is centered on FEL imager

- pblm in XTD9 is inserted

We removed both silicon solid attenuator and pblm

Attachment 1: Init_2024-04-10_16-34-30.png
Init_2024-04-10_16-34-30.png
Attachment 2: status_2024-04-10_16-46-01.png
status_2024-04-10_16-46-01.png
Attachment 3: FEL_imag_2024-04-10_16-40-29.png
FEL_imag_2024-04-10_16-40-29.png
Attachment 4: pblm_2024-04-10_16-52-34.png
pblm_2024-04-10_16-52-34.png
  78   10 Apr 2024, 16:35 Antje TrappXROstart of shift - status

Starting shift with mirror motor calibration:

- found solid attenuator 0.5mm silicon inserted

- beam is centered on FEL imager

- pblm in XTD9 is inserted

We removed both silicon solid attenuator and pblm

Attachment 1: Init_2024-04-10_16-34-30.png
Init_2024-04-10_16-34-30.png
Attachment 2: status_2024-04-10_16-46-01.png
status_2024-04-10_16-46-01.png
Attachment 3: FEL_imag_2024-04-10_16-40-29.png
FEL_imag_2024-04-10_16-40-29.png
Attachment 4: pblm_2024-04-10_16-52-34.png
pblm_2024-04-10_16-52-34.png
  98   09 May 2024, 10:45 Tommaso MazzaSQSother

we needed SASE1 to be set to 0 pulses briefly to check alignment in our experiment.

The FXE control hutch was empty. we could not reach either Chris nor Mykola by phone. The XFEL_StatusPublic shows that the FXE shutter is closed (we can also see the exp hutch door open from outside the control hutch).

Neither PRC nor BKR had any information about the FXE status.

We discussed with PRC and concluded that they are likely not using the beam, so in agreement with PRC we went ahead and got BKR setting SASE1 to 0 pulses at ~10:20. After few seconds, we got BKR setting SASE1 back to 30 pulses.

edit: PRC got in contact with FXE. Turns out they were (are) working in their ILH. we have a contact procedure for the next occasions now.

  44   01 Mar 2024, 17:11 Naresh KujalaPRCStatus

-Machine status

the cold compressor failure occurred at ~16.30hr today. And it will take around 35 hr to fix it. I will update via email (local contacts for experiments) and Operation Elog tomorrow with more details.

Naresh


 

  48   13 Mar 2024, 10:09 Romain LetrunSPBStatus

We checked the XTD2 attenuators following the intervention from XRO (compar ewith elog:37, before the intervention).

The wavefront shows similar distortions with the 75 and 150 um as earlier, which is not too surprising since the cracks are vertical.

Attachments 1-5: Beam on SPB_XTD9_SCR with XTD2 attenuator CVDs

Attachments 6-7: Beam on FEL imager with XTD2 75 and 150 um CVDs

Attachment 1: CVD_75um_2024-03-13_09-48-27.png
CVD_75um_2024-03-13_09-48-27.png
Attachment 2: CVD_150um_2024-03-13_09-49-48.png
CVD_150um_2024-03-13_09-49-48.png
Attachment 3: CVD_300um_2024-03-13_09-50-08.png
CVD_300um_2024-03-13_09-50-08.png
Attachment 4: CVD_600um_2024-03-13_09-50-33.png
CVD_600um_2024-03-13_09-50-33.png
Attachment 5: CVD_1200um_2024-03-13_09-51-41.png
CVD_1200um_2024-03-13_09-51-41.png
Attachment 6: CVD_75um_2024-03-13_08-06-53.png
CVD_75um_2024-03-13_08-06-53.png
Attachment 7: CVD_150um_2024-03-13_08-06-07.png
CVD_150um_2024-03-13_08-06-07.png
  77   10 Apr 2024, 11:55 Harald SinnPRCStatus

Yesterday two motors of the SASE2 seeding mono were damaged. The mono was exchanged in the afternoon and pumped down. Currently, an issue with the vertical cystal motion is being investigated.  The vacuum improved much faster than expected after this intervention, so the hope is that the tunnel can be searched soon and electrons could go through SASE2 already this afternoon. Watch for updates in the program for SASE2 in the DESY logbook under 'Schedule'.     

  83   18 Apr 2024, 19:31 Jan GruenertPRCStatus

The intra-bunchtrain feedback (IBFB) was not active until today afternoon.
Although not strictly required or requested for the current week experiments,
it was decided to turn on this feedback, which should generally be active to
stabilize and improve the arrival time of the photon pulses along pulse trains.

In order to avoid complications during long data acquisitions, the PRC checked back with all ongoing experiments,
identified a suitable time slot, and the IBFB was activated without issues at aound 16h45.

  89   25 Apr 2024, 21:11 Frederik Wolff-FabrisPRCStatus

V0 valve for SA2 closed as the pump P22090I at HED branch enters in wrong state. This closed nearby vacuum valves for HED branch and consequently V0. Vacuum levels at the section remained in 10^-9 all time.

Thanks to VAC-OCD Denis Finze we removed this pump signal from interlock to allow operation in SA2 at MID branch. Further investigation will follow on Friday.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_2024-04-25_211325.png
Screenshot_2024-04-25_211325.png
  107   17 May 2024, 10:42 Dirk RaiserSQSStatus

Laser status:

After the laser issues listed in https://in.xfel.eu/elog/OPERATION-2024/99 the late shift was finally able to find a timing setting for the amplifier trigger that was beyond stable settings under usual conditions, but which allowed to continue taking data runs for the rest of the beamtime reliably. The users were already able to reveal indications of a pump-probe signal in their data.

The issue itself remains but didn't show up in form of unstabilities anymore. After the beamtime LAS took some effort to investigate and narrow down to either a faulty trigger going into the front-end amplifier or on the front-end amplifier itself. To the best of our knowledge this circumstance will need to involve EEE support or even a service from the manufacturer and cannot be solved solely by LAS. LAS ensured that the highest priority will be to deliver stable laser pulses for next week's beamtime as well.

FEL status:

we found the FEL poynting to be very stable troughout the last weeks beamtime (despite some short down-times), which allowed to reliably verify the spatial overlap.

  166   14 Sep 2024, 01:33 Peter ZaldenFXEStatus

FXE received the beam and did not change accelerator settings.

Beam alignment to FXE was re-established using the new values for the old M1/M2 offset.

Monochromator aligned to the SPB energy setpoint.

THz source aligned to Xrays and several reference positions for Xray pointing taken. Further steps require THz radiation, which is not available at this point.

Xrays realigned back to SPB XTD9 screen.

  180   27 Sep 2024, 15:17 Jan GruenertPRCStatus

Bunch pattern SA1 / SA3

SQS requests to change the bunch pattern.
Currently SA1/SA3 run interleaved as 131313...
The first bunch in the train (for SA1, non-lasing in SA3) nevertheless is visible as a small pre-peak in the diode signal which SQS uses to check the timing.
Therefore SQS requests to change to 31313131....

It was checked with SA1 (SPB/SFX) and the accelerator experts that this should not cause any issues (AGIPD detector is running on dynamic trigger),
therefore it was agreed that SPB/SFX informs BKR when there is a good moment without data acquisition, and BKR will make this change after informing SQS.
This change will happen within the next hour (as of 15h20).

  186   29 Sep 2024, 12:13 Jan GruenertPRCStatus

Beam is back. Current status:

SASE1 (SPB/SFX)

  • 2.72 mJ, 352 bunches/train, 6 keV

SASE2 (MID)

  • 880 uJ, 1 bunch/train, 8 keV

SASE3 (SQS)

  • 4.56 mJ, 1 bunch/train, 400 eV (3.1nm)
Attachment 1: JG_2024-09-29_um_12.12.28.png
JG_2024-09-29_um_12.12.28.png
  192   07 Oct 2024, 16:34 Naresh KujalaPRCStatus

Desy Laser group has fixed the issue about the laser Synchronization.

https://ttfinfo.desy.de/XFELelog/show.jsp?dir=/2024/41/07.10_M&pos=2024-10-07T14:51:12

Naresh

PRC

wk41

  209   24 Nov 2024, 17:23 Jan GruenertPRCStatus

Status

All beamlines in operation.
The attachment ATT#1 shows the beam delivery of this afternoon, with the pulse energies on the left and the number of bunches on the right.
SA2 was not affected, SA1 was essentially without beam from 13h45 to 16h15 (2.5h) and SA3 didn't get enough (386) pulses in about the same period.
Beam delivery to all experiments is ok since ~16h15, and SCS is just not taking more pulses for other (internal) reasons.

Attachment 1: JG_2024-11-24_um_17.22.58.png
JG_2024-11-24_um_17.22.58.png
  214   04 Dec 2024, 15:34 Jan GruenertPRCStatus

Beam delivery Status well after tuning finished (which went faster than anticipated).

Attachment 1: JG_2024-12-04_um_15.33.09.png
JG_2024-12-04_um_15.33.09.png
  53   15 Mar 2024, 18:02 Tommaso MazzaSQSStability Issue

it is not clear why, but the beam position on BIU2 has changed over time, even more since we checked last. it is off in both directions

we see the GATT aperture projection drifting, so it is a change in the beam transport, not in the source.

see the beam, cut by the DIAG1 slit, compared to the cross it should be centred to.

the motor encoders in the beamline have not changed since the beginning, when the beam was pointing correctly.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-03-15_18-04-59.png
Screenshot_from_2024-03-15_18-04-59.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-03-15_18-04-39.png
Screenshot_from_2024-03-15_18-04-39.png
  112   26 May 2024, 21:56 Thomas BaumannSQSStability Issue

We asked the machine for two color mode in the morning. Tuning gave good results at first (1.6mJ second color, 100uJ first color), but as soon as any of the colors was switched off and on again the pulse energy dropped (~600uJ) and BKR had to retune to even get a fraction of the pulse energy back back. The same happened when changing the delay

 

  187   29 Sep 2024, 22:29 Chan KimSPBStability Issue

X-ray beam is continuously drifting in the vertical direction (XTD9_XGM)
It affects our NKB focus and focused beam is also drifting continuously.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-09-29_22-24-09_1.png
Screenshot_from_2024-09-29_22-24-09_1.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_from_2024-09-29_22-24-00.png
Screenshot_from_2024-09-29_22-24-00.png
  219   05 Dec 2024, 19:47 Alexey ZozulyaMIDStability Issue

Today we have observed multiple large disturbances to beam stability. These can be characterised by large jumps in the horizontal beam position, which at its extreme amounts to a loss of beam from our behalf. M2 mirror feedbacks are able to return the beam to the initial position after ca. 10 minutes. Beam jumps have been approximately 1hr apart. We do not observe the beam on the XTD6 tunnel imager in this case, but do observe good lasing quality on the XGM.

Attachment 1: 2024-12-05_19-43-31.png
2024-12-05_19-43-31.png
  221   06 Dec 2024, 06:37 Johannes MoellerMIDStability Issue

The jumps keep repeating very frequently since yesterday afternoon. The overall drift of the beam seems to accalerate as well.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2024-12-06_06-39-34.png
Screenshot_from_2024-12-06_06-39-34.png
ELOG V3.1.4-7c3fd00