Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 27 Feb 2025, 07:02
|
X-ray delivery
up to 202/352 pulses per train (~0.8 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5/1.1 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Fixed target measurement was finished |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 28 Feb 2025, 06:57
|
X-ray delivery
up to 202/352 pulses per train (~0.8 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5/1.1 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples
Issues
No major issue today
|
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 01 Mar 2025, 06:56
|
X-ray delivery
up to 202/352 pulses per train (~0.8 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5/1.1 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples
|
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 02 Mar 2025, 06:56
|
X-ray delivery
up to 175 pulses per train (~1 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples
Issues
We could use 188 pulses, but last 13 pulses intensity was too weak, not used for measurement
|
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 03 Mar 2025, 07:05
|
X-ray delivery
up to 188 pulses per train (~1 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 04 Mar 2025, 07:05
|
X-ray delivery
up to 188/352 pulses per train (~1 mJ pulse energy)@13.4 keV, 0.5/1.1 MHz
Optical laser delivery
800 nm, less than 20 fs at sample position, no issue
Achievements/Observations
X-ray beam de-focused to a few um for data taking
PP laser aligned
Data collection for some samples |
Shift summary, posted by Raphael de Wijn on 12 Mar 2025, 23:14
|
SPB/SFX shift summary user experiment 6933 (setup day)
X-ray delivery
-9.6-9.72 keV with Hirex monitoring, 1.4-1.8 mJ/pulse, 352 pulses/train at 1.1 MHz pulse repetition rate, short pulses
Optical laser delivery
-ns laser for illumination
Achievements/Observations
- Beamline aligned
- Energy scan with Zn done and energy set around 9.72 keV (120 eV offset compared to the accelerator value)
- Aligned and could see scattering from silver cubes
|
Issue, posted by Romain Letrun on 17 Mar 2025, 06:51
|
The status of the FXE shutter in the Public status display DOOCS panel is incorrect. Here appears as opened, when it is actually closed. |
Shift end, posted by Tokushi Sato on 27 Mar 2025, 22:57
|
**X-ray delivery:**
* 16 keV, ~upto 1 mJ, 160 pulses
**Optical Laser:**
* None
**Achievements / Observations:**
* Alignement
* Recorded first explosions |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 09 Apr 2025, 22:46
|
X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 400 uJ, 128 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
20 keV beam to sample position and cameras
Rough alignment of optical setup
Issues:
Optical laser from light conversion had issue with shutter control |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 10 Apr 2025, 23:17
|
X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 400 uJ, 128 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Rough timing alignment of optical laser setup
Took some initial data
Issues:
No major issue to report |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 11 Apr 2025, 23:14
|
X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 400 uJ, 246 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Spatial and temporal alignment of optical laser setup
Data collection |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 12 Apr 2025, 23:15
|
X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 500 uJ, 246 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Lots of data collection
Issues:
Shimadzu camera for Schlieren imaging had issue with shutter, mechanically broken. |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 13 Apr 2025, 22:55
|
Staff: PV, TS, JK, FK, + users
X-ray delivery:
20 keV, ~ 300-400 uJ, 250 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Lots of data collection
Issues:
No major issue today |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 14 Apr 2025, 23:08
|
X-ray delivery:
20 keV, 250-400 uJ, 250 pulses, stable delivery
Optical Laser:
1030 nm, 850 fs, stable delivery
Achievements / Observations:
Lots of data collection
Issues:
No major issue today |
Shift summary, posted by Chan Kim on 17 Apr 2025, 01:39
|
X-ray delivery
- 18.8 keV, 260 uJ pulse energy
Optical laser delivery
Achievements/Observations
- Experimental setup optimized, both instrumental side and PIXIE side
- X-ray beam focused to the PIXIE and transmission measurement was done with several different PIXIE operation conditions.
Issues
- No beam for ~4.5 hours due to ZZ.
- X-ray beam not found with IRDa InlineMic after focusing X-ray beam to IRDa sample plane.
- InlineMic Y motor is in error states. It has to be fixed during the day.
- upstream kapton window for the downstream vacuum pipe broken. The glue has become loose. No damage by X-ray was visible.
|
Shift summary, posted by Jayanath Koliyadu on 24 Apr 2025, 06:56
|
X-ray delivery:
10 keV, ~ 900 uJ, 128 pulses, tuning was needed for few hours
Achievements / Observations:
Alignment of crystals
Issues:
X-ray beam intensity was weak at 12.7 keV (100 uJ), so we decided to use 10 keV |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 25 Apr 2025, 06:48
|
X-ray delivery:
10 keV, ~ 850 uJ, 128 pulses, tuning was needed for 1 hour
Optical Laser:
No PP-laser for this week
Achievements / Observations:
Finalized alignment of crystals
Issues:
No major issue today. |
Shift summary, posted by Tokushi Sato on 26 Apr 2025, 06:55
|
Staff: PV, TS, JK + external collaborators
X-ray delivery:
10 keV, ~ 800 uJ, 128 pulses, tuning was needed for 10 min.
Optical Laser:
No PP-laser for this week
Achievements / Observations:
Finalized alignment of X-ray setup
Issues:
No major issue today. |
Issue, posted by Jan Gruenert on 19 Jan 2025, 11:46
|
1) BKR calls SUN11h20 and informs about issues with the SA1 SRA. Motors in ERROR.
2) Additionally, there was this morning a fire alarm, where in one rack (SASE1 rack 1.1 in XTD2) the gas extinguishing system was triggered, see also https://ttfinfo.desy.de/XFELelog/show.jsp?dir=/2025/03/19.01_M&pos=2025-01-19T10:22:14
PRC investigating.
BEAM STATUS: SA1 is still lasing at 1100 uJ at 9 keV, IMGFEL is inserted and beam visible. XGM and imagers operational.
- All SA1-SRA MOTORS (SA1_XTD2_PSLIT/MOTOR/) in sa1_beckhoff_mov are in ERROR and cannot be reset.
- Same for SA1_XTD2_FLT/MOTOR/TARGET (in ERROR and cannot be reset)
- SA1_XTD2_SRA_SLIT/MDL/MAIN in ERROR
- Same for SA1_XTD9_IMGPII45/MOTOR/NAVITAR_FOCUS and _ZOOM, but these karabo devices can be RESET, however Hardware State remains ERROR. Hardware interlocked.
- Same for SA1_XTD2_PES/SWITCH/G1_OK and G2_OK, but these karabo devices can be RESET, and the Hardware State here is then OFF. Hardware REGION is normal.
- SA1_XTD2_PES/SERIAL/V101256D and SA1_XTD2_PES/VALVE/V101256D in ERROR, can be reset. the STATE = NORMAL.
- Also found in ERROR: SA1_XTD2_WATCHDOG/MDL/STOP2_BKG_IMGFEL (but can be reset, is stopped).
- BeckhoffPlcMonitor SA1_BR_SYS/PLC/MOV_PLCMON in ERROR, can be reset, Hardware state NORMAL.
- SA1_XTD9_MIRR/ACTRL/RZ in ERROR (not the other related motors)
- SA1_XTD2_PSLIT/LVDT/BLADE... all in ERROR, can be reset, then hardware state ON. Hardware error description: "PLC Error: Terminal is not operational"
- SA1_XTD9_MIRR/ASESN/RY and RZ in ERROR, can be reset, then hardware state ON. Hardware error description: "0xc009"
- SA1_BR_SYS/PLC/XFELO_PLCMON in ERROR, can be reset, Hardware state NORMAL.
- SA1_XTD2_DOOCS/CAM/OTRC_2615_T9 (DOOCS-to-karabo bridge for transmissive imager) not instantiated. I instantiate it, there are no issues, works fine.
- Everything OK with SA1 vacuum devices.
Actions for BKR to continue SASE tuning:
- The IMGFEL image is oversaturated. Changing to BN. The beam is at (13.5mm / 4mm), while the handover cross is at (12.75, 5.22mm). Beam is clipping at the top SRA blade.
- inserting transmissive imager (YAG). Beam is fully visible and centered at X=1045,Y=1140. Instruction to BKR to use this imager to shift the beam center, and then continue on IMGFEL.
Further actions:
- Information to DRC (Bruno)
- He will inform EEE-OCD to look into the issue and see what they might be able to fix without an access.
- If they find out an access is required to fix hardware in XTD2, we will request an access (probably not today but MON or TUE).
- A redmine ticket of DOC will collect the infos from DRC and EEE-OCD.
A similar issue at SA1 XTD2 rack 1.1 had occurred in November 2024, see https://in.xfel.eu/elog/OPERATION-2024/205
Updates MON morning:
- EEE made the access request and it was scheduled for MON 10am: #215916 - Suspected blown fuse replacement in Rack 1.1
|
|