ID |
Date |
Author |
Group |
Subject |
190
|
01 Oct 2024, 02:39 |
Tokushi Sato | SPB | Shift summary |
X-ray delivery
6 keV, ~2.8 mJ, continuous beam drift in both direction
Optical laser delivery
ns laser for particle visualization
Achievements/Observations
DAta collection for CDI
Julabo chiller (AGIPD) is still on target (-32 degree)
Issues
Continuous beam drift in the both direction: NKB focus was optimized almost every 2 hours |
193
|
24 Oct 2024, 06:51 |
Chan Kim | SPB | Shift summary |
X-ray delivery
12.4 keV, ~1.4 mJ
Achievements/Observations
- Beam is through the inline mic
- Flight tube vacuum optimized
- Beam trajectory up to JF4M manually optimized
- EHC CRLs aligned
|
194
|
25 Oct 2024, 05:51 |
Chan Kim | SPB | Shift summary |
X-ray delivery
12.4 keV, ~1.4 mJ
Achievements/Observations
Beam was focused on a YaG, alignment finished up to JF4M |
196
|
31 Oct 2024, 02:43 |
Ulrike Boesenberg | MID | Shift summary |
12.389keV, HXRSS, 1-400+ bunches, 450uJ
- Seeding alignment
- Beamline alignment (Mirror + foccussing)
- Measured energy and moved it the requested value
- Cryos for sample and monochromator are prepared
- Aligned DES spectrometer
- Started with DCCM characterization (440)
|
197
|
03 Nov 2024, 00:00 |
Raphael de Wijn | SPB | Shift summary |
X-ray delivery
12.5 keV, ~1.6 mJ
Achievements/Observations:
Collected almost 40 runs of the priority sample with 7 pulses per train using the Polypico injection system.
Issues:
Jungfrau controller issue when changing back to single cell adaptive to collect powder data with new geometry (solved together with DOC).
Pipeline issue after requesting single cell correction - still the same bug in the calibration pipeline, the pipeline has to be re-instantiated after the change. |
71
|
31 Mar 2024, 23:20 |
Adam Round | SPB | Shift end |
X-ray delivery
- 12.72 keV, 10Hz, ~1.4 mJ/pulse, some beam drift in the horizontal direction observed (probably mirror related)
Optical laser delivery
- 487 nm ns laser for pump-probe
- 800 nm PP laser for jet illumination, stable delivery
Achievements/Observations
- Collected PP (pump-probe) dataset with 5 us time delay more than 12 hours
- Jet and data collection was stable most of the time
|
76
|
08 Apr 2024, 06:37 |
Marcin Sikorski | SPB | Shift end |
In-house/commissioning beam time summary night 5
X-ray delivery:
12.7 keV, up to 128 pulses at 0.5MHz, ~1.3 mJ, one very short beam down.
Optical laser delivery:
PP laser for illumination
Achievements/observations:
- AGIPD1.2 tests with different trigger delays, gain modes, signal levels ...
- inhouse proghram completed
Issues:
Some sample delivery issues |
163
|
12 Sep 2024, 23:48 |
Adam Round | SPB | Shift end |
X-ray delivery
8.951 keV, 1.6 mJ
Achievements/Observations
Beam trajectory and focusing established for 8.951 keV
HIREX inserted for energy reference for calibration tomorrow
Temporary beamstop verified position for direct beam.
Mirror tank inserted to beam path
|
165
|
13 Sep 2024, 23:17 |
Adam Round | SPB | Shift end |
On Shift: TS, FT, CK, AR, PS
X-ray delivery
8.951 keV, 1.6 mJ up to 200 pulses at 0.5 MHz (intesity drops off at end of train)
Achievements/Observations
Beam trajectory and focusing re-established at 8.951 keV
Temporary beamstop verified position for sweeping - confirmed by eric
Beam sweeping in synchronisation with pulse trains observed!
slit window assembly remounted and beam is going through to back of hutch in perparation for optimisation next shft |
128
|
22 Jul 2024, 15:27 |
Antje Trapp | XRO | SASE3 end of shift summary |
this morning, ZZ was done together with Sylvia Huynh (EEE) to solve softmono pre-mirror motor issue https://redmine.xfel.eu/issues/177392
The issue was solved and also mechanical functionality of the stage was checked.
After ZZ, the beamline remained interlocked. Hutches will be searched and closed tonight to allow final checks on Tuesday |
129
|
22 Jul 2024, 15:20 |
Antje Trapp | XRO | SASE2 end of shift summary |
Beam is now aligned back to HED for hand-over to Naresh (see picture)
points achieved:
-vibometer measurements on M2 at high energy, 2,1 and 3 mrad setting
-tried again to find beam through pblm grating, but no success |
Attachment 1: HED_beam__2024-07-22_15-19-15.png
|
|
81
|
11 Apr 2024, 21:54 |
Antje Trapp | XRO | SASE1 MIRROR MOTORS CALIBRATED |
Dear all,
we calibrated the mirror vertical motors to their geometrically neutral.
Please be aware that saved values for beamline settings may no longer be valid. This mainly applies to the vertical motor positions, but will have an impact on Tx and Ry values as well.
As starting point, use XRO Optics Setpoints 'C' - this setting was last used to bring beam to SPB |
Attachment 1: XRO_optics-setpoints_2024-04-11_22-05-08.png
|
|
85
|
20 Apr 2024, 23:58 |
Jan Gruenert | PRC | SA2 status |
20.4.2024 / 22h51:
DOC informed PRC that the SASE2 topic broker had to be restarted.
The EPS power limit was reset by PRC to the previous value of 40 W.
DOC and DRC are working on the restart. HED is in hardware setup configuration change (not currently taking beam, thus no harm to experiment),
will start taking beam with new users sunday 7am, but would need before this some test runs for the detectors.
Currently the SA2 topic watchdogs (for ATT, CRL, imagers) cannot be restarted - they crash quickly after restarting.
DOC/DRC are investigating this issue. Until the watchdogs are successfully restarted, extra care must be taken when using ATT, CRL, imagers in SA2.
Update 21.4.2024 / 1h43 by DRC:
In a similar fashion to the incident of last 5.04, the Broker process for the SA2 and LA2 topic has restarted.
This was noticed by the DOC crew and by the HED crew in parallel.
With the help of the CTRL OCD (Micheal Smith) we restarted both topics. As a lesson learned from the last interruption, the POWER_LIMIT
middlelayer device has been set up by the PRC, so that when the DOOCS bridges will be restarted by the DESY-MCS personnel,
the maximum power will not be set to 0.
Please check in due time if all systems are working as intended.
|
198
|
04 Nov 2024, 15:07 |
Frederik Wolff-Fabris | XO | SA2 status |
Dear MID colleagues, Svitozar (PRC), Bolko and Shan (RCs),
This morning we faced the situation where MID was limited to 400 pulses (mode M) via the EPS signals. The current RF window set at the machine allows to the requested 450 pulses.
The limiting conditions were the inserted graphite filter (#2) and the diamon screen at the MID Pop-in (#17). After a discussion with experts (and thanking Naresh, Wolfgang and Andreas), both conditions in EPS mode F (see attached) are now disabled, as the current SA2 beam offer safe condition for both devices.
This special situation with disabled EPS signals in mode F is in place until Tuesday 05.Nov as MID will stay at ~12.28keV and with HXRSS (500-600uJ). Please note that in case of either a change in photon energy, substantial increase of photon flux, longer SA RF window or the wish to insert YAG screen at the SA2 Pop-in, these two mentioned conditions have to be enabled again at the SA2 EPS Mode F prior these actions take place.
After the beamtime ends on Tuesday 7AM, either me, Naresh or the PRC will make sure these two EPS conditions are re-enabled.
In case of questions please do not hesitate in contacting me.
Best wishes,
Frederik
**Update Mon 15:00: The beamtime delivery to MID is extended up to Tuesday 9AM. At this moment the EPS signals will be enabled again by Frederik W.-F.
|
4
|
31 Jan 2024, 11:24 |
Frederik Wolff-Fabris | PRC | SA1 status |
A ZZ is taking place today, 31.01 at 11:30, in XTD9 to verify and fix the M3 Pop-in screen which is currently blocking the beam. It is not yet clear if this is an electrical or mechnical problem.
** Update 13:05: ZZ intervention is finished and successful. A mechanical issue due to a loose coupling between motor and spindle was fixed. Machine is running again and SPB/SFX can use the beam. |
39
|
28 Feb 2024, 08:57 |
Peter Zalden | FXE | SA1 status |
5.61 keV setpoint in SA1 was confirmed to correspond to 5.660 keV (+/- 0.003 keV), see attached.
The user expt #5644 can proceed as planned. |
Attachment 1: 2024-02-28-081608_626485769_exflqr51474.png
|
|
172
|
21 Sep 2024, 09:50 |
Peter Zalden | FXE | SA1 status |
The xray beam drifted significantly on wednesday and thursday (18. and 19.) but then was not drifting on friday (20.), see attached trendline of the M2 actuator that kept the beam at fixed position on M3.
Today also seems that beam pointing is stable. But unclear what happened earlier... |
Attachment 1: 2024-09-21-094858_073864177_exflqr51474.png
|
|
195
|
28 Oct 2024, 09:58 |
Peter Zalden | FXE | SA1 status |
This is to report some findings during operation that should be looked into (mostly to avoid in the future, because both negatively affect data quality of the user expt at FXE):
- At the moment, the 99:1 mode affects 4 to 5 pulses out of 100 in SA1, see first screenshot that shows in the top right the IPM reading with each blue point denoting the average pulse energy in a train. This was not always the case. After initial setup on thursday it did affect only a single train out of 100.
- On 27.10., the switching of SA2 between 1 and multiple bunches affected SA1 beam heavily, see the jumps in SA1 pulse energy in the second screenshot shown here:
- The pulse energy dropped by 15% and
- the pointing changed vertically by 150 um on the FXE PI (data not shown, but available from karabo trendlines)
Edit 8.11.: Added screenshot (grafana/ctrend) to show that the vertical displacement was permanent (not corrected by the feedback) |
Attachment 1: 2024-10-28-095823_156722903_exflqr37199.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 2024-10-28-100227_584317851_exflqr37199.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Screenshot_2024-11-08_093316.png
|
|
80
|
10 Apr 2024, 17:03 |
Kelin Tasca | XRO | M3 calibration |
- M3 TX moved to 0 in steps of 1 mm and beam on FXE Pop-In corrected with M3 RY (+) and M2 RY
- Started calibration with M3 Rz in steps of 0.5 (+) and corrected with M2 RY and RZ to find a position with a minimum of parasitic motion
- Iterations with M3 TY
- CRL 3 and 4 were inserted (using find target)
- The backlash correction was disabled
- Curve for M3 Rz position with Ry correction done. M2 RY/RZ corrections to move beam up and down to have it on the screen
- Curve for M3 Ty position with Ry correction done.
- Curve for M3 Rx position with Ry correction done
M3 vertical motors calibrated to 0
|
Attachment 1: SA1_M1_calibration.ods
|
Attachment 2: M3_at_nominal_2024-04-10_21-16-39.png
|
|
Attachment 3: M3_calibrated_2024-04-10_21-20-34.png
|
|
157
|
30 Aug 2024, 13:02 |
Antje Trapp | XRO | M1 Rz damaged - DO NOT MOVE!!! |
What has happened:
During euler motion calibration of M1, we were driving the vertical motors by a few mm back and forth. At some point, the Rz motor went into error, as we attempted to go further in negative direction. Resetting the axis several times did not solve the problem. The vertical motors were then moved to 0 position. DOC was called and helped to overwrite some parameters that triggered the error.
When resuming the calibration routine, the beam suddenly got lost and the vacuum interlock triggered V0 to close. Vacuum in M1 recovered quickly, but on M2 popIn, only the direct beam could be seen. At this point, the conclusion was that one of the motor connections must have come loose, which caused the vacuum event and removed M1 from the beam.
It was then decided, that we break the interlock, vent the chamber and re-connect the motor if possible.
The situation we found was the following:
-Rz connection lead-screw to bellow was detached
-mirror sitting on the mirror holder
-significant InGa spillage on chamber bottom, window flanges opposite to the mirror AND a lot of drops on the mirror surface
Pictures are attached.
Intervention:
The lead-screw and nut were exchanged. There was significant wear on the bearing plate, connecting the lead-screw to the bellow.
When trying to install the new lead-screw with a spare bearing plate, it was found that apparently the thread on the bellow side was deformed as well, and the spare part did not fit to the thread. Since the old bearing plate was the only possible way to connect the lead-screw to the bellow, it was cleaned, lubricated and re-used. The position was manually adjusted around 0 position (66,7mm protrusion) and the motor connected.
Recommendations:
- since the damaged bearing plate was re-installed, it should be avoided to move Rz. The motor should be permanently interlocked and only operated with absolute care for initial alignment.
- the mirror surface is severely contaminated with InGa, it must be checked if a position with acceptable beam can be found (only to be done by XRO as this needs Rz to be moved)
- the affected bellow has to be exchanged to facilitate replacement of the damaged bearing plate. As this requires the mirror chamber to be opened, this only makes sense in connection with replacement of the mirror + cleaning of the chamber. |
Attachment 1: 2024-08-29-15-42-22-302.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: 2024-08-29-17-33-39-090.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: 2024-08-29-15-53-56-553.jpg
|
|
Attachment 4: 2024-08-29-15-44-10-188.jpg
|
|
Attachment 5: 2024-08-29-15-44-37-755.jpg
|
|
Attachment 6: 2024-08-29-15-44-21-362.jpg
|
|