Group Selection Page HELP Controls Group ITDM Vacuum WP78 SPB SQS XO ToBeMigrated2XWiki ToBeMigrated2GitlabPages ToBeMigratedByGroup Migrated2Zulip Archived2PDF not2MigrateOrArchive
SCS SXP Migrated2Zulip Photon Commissioning Team XRO DOC HED Migrated2Zulip WP74 MID PSPO_XO XO_Operation SQS Migrated2Zulip FXE Migrated2Zulip DET Sample Environment SPB Migrated2Zulip
SASE1 Status and SASE3 Readiness Technical integration and coordination
  Joint Operation and Readiness Logbook, Contact: T.Haas, A. Violante, G. Wellenreuther  Not logged in ELOG logo
Message ID: 3     Entry time: 03 Nov 2016, 12:58
Author: Alessandro Silenzi 
Location: XTD2 
Severity: Information 
Subject: Current PLC-Karabo Conflict 

Tobias Freyermuth and me worked on the system and as of last night, we found two new issues between Karabo and the PLC interlock:
 - one is a Karabo issue from the Interlock PLC interaction, the Karabo device waits for a PLC response that does not come when the PLC is interlocked (i.e. Karabo wants to open a valve but the PLC correctly refuses and ignores the command)


 - one is a PLC issue, the interlock is not triggered in all cases after testing (e.g. a ion pump out of set point does not closes a gate valve closure as specified).

The first one was reproduced with the BeckhoffSim simulation. It can therefore be fixed by CAS without dependencies from AE (except for the next integration test).

ELOG V3.1.4-7c3fd00